Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Rockstar Games is not liable for any lost that might affect you due to natural events that affected Rockstar Games:
Fire, flood, theft, data breach. For example, you lost your beloved online character, suffered emotional distress, sue for pain and suffering from the lost of your game lover and subsequent sleepless nights and tears shed.
However, the contract isn't meant to exclude liabilities which cannot be omitted by law and that are caused by the negligence of Rockstar Games, including fraud, Death or Personal Injury:
You saw the new super vehicle but don't have in-game money to buy it. You threaten Rockstar that if you don't get a new character with 100 billion dollars and a top-of-the-line Faggio Sport, you will hold your breath until you pass out and possibly die. Rockstar Games reports you to the police as record, so there is no negligence. This responsibility cannot be excluded, just by signing the contract.
Was that kind of clear? 😂😊
Being a massive company is hard huh? XD
But no, i dont understand a damn thing about all of this, it goes over my head. How can i suffer personal injury or DEATH by playing their games? Epilepsy maybe but thats why there is warnings for it... But the rest sounds kinda... hysteric.
To understand how deep a sue can go, you would need to go to law school.
The thing is that if you are a big company, theres no such thing as "beeing too cautious". So they do this stuff "just in case", in order to avoid stupid sues and prevent losses (time, money, resources, etc).
People can sue for ANYTHING, and laws are really a thing of interpretation.
I could see someone starving to death because they choose to buy gold bars instead of food, and then their parents suing the game company over it.
I could see someone dying from a heart attack at a young age and their parents determining it was the game's fault that they sat on the couch 24/7 and grew into a parade float.
I could see someone writing a manifesto that game X taught them how to shoot a gun and also taught them to hate people who harm animals, and so they go and shoot up the meat aisle at a grocery store and the cops intervene and they get killed.
Never underestimate the stupidity of humans.
As an European, i always forget about this fact lol... In my country that would be impossible to do, you wouldnt even get a Case. But i know some U.S Attourneys litteraly make a living off of things like these so.. Not too surprising anymore now.
Not to say things like these are impossible to happen in europe ofc. Stupididy doesnt know national boundaries. But it would be a much easyer case over here, doubt there would even be a trial.
They takes our money, takes the piss and then saves ass.
Twas ever thus.
Well thanks for your considered thought.
If only I had had the benefit of your wisdom before I posted my remarks.
"I mean"!
Is there no end to your needless rudeness [rhetorical].
Is there no end to your appalling grammar [rhetorical].
What do we do with your ilk? You get the blocking you deserve.
Bye.
This post was just about some confusion going on for me, then people answered it. Your rage post about "big bad companys" didnt bring any usefulness to this, so i told you simply noone is forced to play games they dont enjoy and then you made a snarky comment, how am i supposed to take you serious that way?
And now you are grabbing straws "threatening" me with getting me blocked all though that is not even in your power and also going after my grammar because you got nothing else as a counter. Once again proof you dont have any useful contribution for this thread. :P
Although the contract is signed by the users, its terms are mainly written and meant for other lawyers -- sort of like a game of legal chess -- to cover all legal basis.
For instance:
Players have different opinion regarding Red Dead Online and its related services and decide to have a dual of the 21st Century. Armed with verbal bullets, the cowmen fire lethal words at each other from one of the game's town halls: Have a brain! You first! Potato face!
Other users join in to create a catastrophe of the game's town hall.
After the battle, users sustained personal injuries due to the event in the form of emotional damage and decide to sue Rockstar Games for Negligence with Injury, for failure to provide a safe environment to interact with the services of the game.
Since it's a catastrophe caused by users and, therefore, falls into Force Majeure and that the game's town hall where it took place belongs to a 3rd party, Rockstar Games is not legally liable herein👻🤣
Being facetious to explain a scenario the terms intend to cover legally 😂😊 Isn't law fun lol