Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
While I only found this from some place I forgot, it does make some sense.
In any case, if they where to remake it to have the town building back instead of just going to each place like a stage in a action game.
yeah the head of nintendo north america basically said the city building aspect was above our heads and to make it action only. Or something close to that I cant remember the quote exactly other than they assumed the game that sold well wouldn't sell well if they did what we liked about it again. Because that just doesn't work in America. lol
I hated Act raiser 2 as a kid because I also missed that sim-like stuff but I can't even get into the original Act raiser 1 any more because the sim elements are so shallow. I actually think that the Act raiser 1 remake is an improvement because they finally turned into somewhat of a real strategy game. I'd have preferred a 4x strategy or Romance of the three kingdoms approach but Tower defense was the best approach they could've taken while still making the strategy portions action-based.