RuneScape: Dragonwilds

RuneScape: Dragonwilds

JediPro16 Mar 31 @ 7:06pm
Please increase the maximum number of players to 6 or 8
Every time the limit is 4 players, some friend is left out of the game
< >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
RenatoAk Mar 31 @ 8:16pm 
why stop on 6 ? let ppl have dedicate servers for more like ark
stan Mar 31 @ 8:24pm 
this, i mean atleast 5 would good
Originally posted by stan:
this, i mean atleast 5 would good
It would be much better
Originally posted by RenatoAk:
why stop on 6 ? let ppl have dedicate servers for more like ark
yes, servers with mods and it will become runescape 2 hahahaha
Nymbo Mar 31 @ 9:23pm 
2
no anymore than 4 is a waste of time, there are 4 classes, its an rpg not an mmo. this game is not going to be runescape, there wont be a grind to it with skills and 99 capes and massive quest lore, its the dragon slayer quest lines but as an RPG.

thats how you should be looking at this
D M Mar 31 @ 11:30pm 
I agree. Usually survival games are teams of 5-8 that makes it worthwhile. A team of 4 is not appealing.
masak Apr 1 @ 1:37am 
well if the devs / company want the game to succeed. look at palworld from last year. or some of the other survival games or some really old titles that let dedicated servers / mods.

it doesnt need to be a mmo to succeed, but with good content / design and and mod-ability / tool set. and with most games by default now sort of scale up or down with enemy stats depending on amount of players in game or area in the vicinity.

but we all know a lot of companies don't like to do this due to there bottom line which = $$$
Originally posted by masak:
well if the devs / company want the game to succeed. look at palworld from last year. or some of the other survival games or some really old titles that let dedicated servers / mods.

it doesnt need to be a mmo to succeed, but with good content / design and and mod-ability / tool set. and with most games by default now sort of scale up or down with enemy stats depending on amount of players in game or area in the vicinity.

but we all know a lot of companies don't like to do this due to there bottom line which = $$$
I agree, I was just joking about the idea of ​​mods. But I'm really excited about this new survival game.
I just wish the maximum players were higher so I could share it with more friends, if we look at big survival games as an example, don't starve(6 players), valheim(10 players) and the forest(8 players)
Just ask for limitless number, like with Just Cause multiplayer mod. That was fun with hundreds of peeps in the same place within few hundred meters apart, everyone trying to hijack each others planes.
Last edited by IchigoMait; Apr 1 @ 1:59pm
Eclipse Apr 15 @ 1:58pm 
Not sure if there's information I'm missing here but why not just have "group" size of 4 and a server limit of like 24 or 32 players.

Guilds can have there own independent progression and everyone can play. It would open the door to online public servers as well. A huge portion of the survival craft gerne is creative expression with PVE builds. Entire community's exists in all similar games where people just build cities and write there own stories. Set in a fancy world in the runescape universe? PVE RP players will flock in droves, especially with those beautiful visuals liken to valheim.
Floki 95 Apr 15 @ 3:55pm 
100% needs to be a bigger party’s ideally 6/8 max or more and servers where people can play when the owner is offline
Asi Apr 16 @ 11:31am 
Yes please increase the limit. We're a group of 6 playing these type of games together. It's really sad when we have to divide the group. 8-10 players or no limit seems like better options. Let people play like they want ❤️
Rhallos Apr 16 @ 2:41pm 
Please increase the player limit! My group of 5-6 won't buy unless we can play it together.
Clonile Apr 16 @ 7:24pm 
My group plays games like 7 days to die, valheim, minecraft and many others in seasons before moving to another but we all like playing together we typically have 6-8 people online at a time and our own events hitting like 10-13 so just let me play with all my friends rather than having to switch in and out.
Devil Apr 16 @ 7:27pm 
Originally posted by Nymbo:
no anymore than 4 is a waste of time, there are 4 classes, its an rpg not an mmo. this game is not going to be runescape, there wont be a grind to it with skills and 99 capes and massive quest lore, its the dragon slayer quest lines but as an RPG.

thats how you should be looking at this
i mean have you looked at the resource grind yet?. i agree with it being an rpg and not an mmo, but look at the competition; enshrouded and valheim. they both support more than 4 players by a wide margin. i would also like the option to play with more people. i do not want it to turn into hundreds, but a 10-16 cap would be nice.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 31 @ 7:06pm
Posts: 17