Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Players should inform themselves before buying a product and otherwise should serve a few years in prison when buying bad products, to learn that they are the cause that companies even try to put out bad products.
It's steams fault for letting crap games on here.
Just look at dead matter.
What are you talking about, who do you think i am? Im a little noone a gamer and all i can do is make noise and not buy such scams. When i look around what was going on this year with half baked broken releases, thats far more then most have done.
First the gaming community has to admit to themselfs, that this is no longer acceptable. That they have to stand up against such scams and then we can do something together. Noone is doing somthing alone agianst this, thats the mistake you make.
You run around and pointing the finger at me, while you have nothing to say. But we are all in this boat together and yeah that includes developers aswell btw. They are actually the ones wich could do something. They are the connection between gamers and publisher ...
Let me ask you one thing, should we also act like this when it comes to other crimes?
Victim mentality. You’re right I don’t have anything to say on the topic as They didn’t commit any crime. At most they should have posted a more recent video of gameplay but it’s your fault you were so emotionally invested from a video 4 years ago. Take some accountability. I know you didn’t want to hear that and I can explain it further but really can’t be bothered.
You have no clue what you are talking about, i speak not just about this one game buddy, i speak about this whole industry and its community wich is of great importance and i can promis you, that makes me emotional because im a human with a beating heart ;-)
You should tell this to the guys wich putted more then 2 hours into it xD
The whole internet was warning about this game, i believe even sites and channels wich have nothing to do with gaming warned about it and still, its here xD
Or specifically list out what law you think should be created that you think they broke according to your perception .
Bait and switch.
It is illegal in the UK to say it's one thing about a product.
But then on release it's another thing.
It must do what it says it can and is.
That would be reasonable ... but unfortunately we are talking about humans in general and gamers in the 21st century in particular.
Let me make one thing clear: the early access thing is a great thing for all the small studios and small teams that want to make their dream games come true, I love it. But unfortunately, the early access tag has always been abused by some studios to simply make quick money. I know, I've bought a lot of early access titles to support such small studios.
But we've reached a stage where we're even getting completely broken releases from Triple A Studios and that can no longer be accepted. Of course I'm not an expert or a lawyer, I don't know if there are already laws that could work here. I tend to think that's not really the case or that they're difficult to apply here because software is a very specific thing. That's why I say someone needs to deal with this.
I'm not sure who is responsible for this. But I'm pretty sure that, for example, small developers who create assets for larger studios and suffer from crises and other things know it. I actually wonder why they haven't already taken action against such things and said no to publishers and investors. Why they don't fight against unrealistic publication deadlines and the like.
As I said before, I think the developers are actually the most important people in this chain. They know what they are doing and what is about to be released. They also know whether a game is designed in such a way that you only notice its bad condition after a few hours and then you can no longer get your money back. They are the ones who have to stand up and say no, and of course we do too ;-)
You do not understand, dont you? Im not a lawyer, i can only make noise, other people then have to decide what laws can be applied or made here. The only thing i have in mind, is an independent organisation, that tests games befor release and gives them a go or no. But i think that will be extrtemly hard to realise if not impossible. Thats why i say we need laws, to make sure studios do not even dare to cross some lines ;-)
I have the same impression and i think its true for the most part :_(
Let me make one thing clear: the early access thing is a great thing for all the small studios and small teams that want to make their dream games come true, I love it. But unfortunately, the early access tag has always been abused by some studios to simply make quick money. I know, I've bought a lot of early access titles to support such small studios.
But we've reached a stage where we're even getting completely broken releases from Triple A Studios and that can no longer be accepted. Of course I'm not an expert or a lawyer, I don't know if there are already laws that could work here. I tend to think that's not really the case or that they're difficult to apply here because software is a very specific thing. That's why I say someone needs to deal with this.
I'm not sure who is responsible for this. But I'm pretty sure that, for example, small developers who create assets for larger studios and suffer from crises and other things know it. I actually wonder why they haven't already taken action against such things and said no to publishers and investors. Why they don't fight against unrealistic publication deadlines and the like.
As I said before, I think the developers are actually the most important people in this chain. They know what they are doing and what is about to be released. They also know whether a game is designed in such a way that you only notice its bad condition after a few hours and then you can no longer get your money back. They are the ones who have to stand up and say no, and of course we do too ;-)
You do not understand, dont you? Im not a lawyer, i can only make noise, other people then have to decide what laws can be applied or made here. The only thing i have in mind, is an independent organisation, that tests games befor release and gives them a go or no. But i think that will be extrtemly hard to realise if not impossible. Thats why i say we need laws, to make sure studios do not even dare to cross some lines ;-)
I have the same impression and i think its true for the most part :_(
Maybe you are right, but someone has to do something about it. If you do what they do in another business, you get sued for sure and to rights ;-)