39.99 for a early accest indie games? lol :: No Rest for the Wicked Allmänna diskussioner

No Rest for the Wicked

Alla Diskussioner Skärmbilder Konst Sändningar Filmer Nyheter Guider Recensioner

No Rest for the Wicked > Allmänna diskussioner > Ämnesdetaljer

KORUZHU 6 apr, 2024 @ 19:00

39.99 for a early accest indie games? lol

More than Palworld, son of the forest, Valheim. Hell, it's the same price as Helldiver 2, A full finished AA game. just LMAO

< >

Visar 61-70 av 70 kommentarer

ChubbiChibbai har No Rest for the Wicked

16 apr, 2024 @ 11:35

Ursprungligen skrivet av KORUZHU:
Ursprungligen skrivet av ChubbiChibbai:

It's ok to just say 'i can't afford this right now'
Or buy it when it's fully released and has been reviewed and you have had your favourite youtuber that makes all your decisions for you so you don't have to think tell you that it's worth playing.
I can buy those games, I already do. but refuse to buy this one just yet before knowing the quality. For the price they asked for it should at least be of better quality and quantity (playtime) than those above games in the early access stage. People just quick to say that if someone questions the price, they must be broke. The real question is, do those prices reflect the quality and quantity of the game? it's safer to assume less than overvalue it like people here, some even saying it's worth $100 and better that any indie and AA game that exist, for a game they don't even play yet, which is absurd and a pinnacle of fanboying. I am just being rational here, if that simple behavior is not acceptable, well, we all know who the problems are.

No. The price should reflect the value of the finished game because that is what you are paying for - you are just paying now to get in early during development.

It's safe to assume the finished game will be well worth that because of the calibre of the developer.

If the asking price is not worth it to you right now then that is fine. Just don't buy it and wait for reviews once the full game is released.

The developer has set the price based on what they have determined is appropriate for their product.

#61

Blowfeld

16 apr, 2024 @ 11:38

Supply and demand. Free market.

If they set the price too high, they will have to hit the market with sales and maybe even adjust the price downward in the future.

The price is a gamble, sure. But if the product is good, I am willing to pay it.

#62

Melodia 16 apr, 2024 @ 13:00

Ursprungligen skrivet av ChubbiChibbai:
No. The price should reflect the value of the finished game because that is what you are paying for

Even Steam disagrees with you on that. Read the disclaimer that appears on every single Early Access game.

#63

$ickbøy

16 apr, 2024 @ 13:26

probably 1000X better than Diablo 4, i can pay 70$ for this

#64

MGMons 16 apr, 2024 @ 13:37

Ursprungligen skrivet av Melodia:
Ursprungligen skrivet av ChubbiChibbai:
No. The price should reflect the value of the finished game because that is what you are paying for

Even Steam disagrees with you on that. Read the disclaimer that appears on every single Early Access game.

Indeed. EA will be 39,99 but 1.0 will be priced even higher.

#65

holi_shet

16 apr, 2024 @ 14:24

well he have a point tho game is at EA and asking for full price for indie game, devs are testing costumers last 1 year they are more and more rising the prices like starwars 80$ for a half game and 120$ for a full game (day 1 dlc they say but they just cut peace of cake and giving you a half there are no day 1 dlc newer was its a fckng release) and ppl are allowing them to take more and more soon AAA games will be 150$ and indie games will be 80$+ cuz u guys allowing it.

#66