Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
(Also for ForBlaze)
That's funny because I just started testing some things with Veteran vs Psyker. And as I have suspected, Psyker's Perils doing basically the same damage as Veteran is completely false.
I stood at the center of the Rager section (without any prep before hand, which you should do before even attempting the penance (Extra parenthesis, which is what naturally would happen)) And I got them to about 1/4 HP
Or about 600 Damage.
I did this same test on Veteran (obviously not perils explosion but with grenade)
and the grenade (no feats affecting) did 100 Damage.
-
So the facts are stated
ForBlaze:
- Is a load of BS and has no imagination. Doing the penance (on accident) in a sticky stressful situation is very doable.
- Perils does 6x more damage than Veteran Grenade (haven't even got the chance to test Crushers yet), disproving that argument.
- This whole thread is proof of a skill issue and overexaggeration of problems the game has
Edit I read something different to what was posted, sorr, but yeah I don't get the complaining and this overly drawn out argument that I could've debunked in a few minutes in the testing area.
You're right, I was trying to save something that couldn't be saved. The concept should be scrapped entirely and replaced with something completely different.
It's interesting you're now talking about building bad behaviors around suicide bombing when it already does that.
They matter because you're suggesting that this is something that will just happen naturally when you've played for 176 hours without it happening. That you don't actually play psyker makes it more understandable why you don't understand just how bad perils of the warp is though.
Even the Perils explosion has no decrease in damage against a Crusher. It's 600 damage which takes them down to 2/3 of their healthbar.
This is actually hilarious.
I mean I just proved how *good* perils of the warp is against Crushers/Ragers, the two targets you would likely get pinned in a corner by.
It's funny you're still going about something that is completely false and making the assumption (I/or others) don't know what we're talking about.
Same for keeping 6 orgyn alive, or rushing you through with less than 1 wound of health in 20 mins, or 0 missed shot 0 ammo and not being melee hit at all...
Can a premade complete it as a challegen sure, but any pug it's nothing but griefing....
Veteran grenade does 900 damage
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2916664114
Crusher and Ragers buddy. Pay attention and read.
Also Edit: Even worse that Perils even goes through Bulwark shields, so that's even more proof how much better it is over the Veteran grenade, and even more proof that people in this forum has dramatized how hard it is to do this penance.
I could go and get this done quickly in a high-intensity malice mission if I really wanted to.
No, plenty of arguments have been made. And they solidly trounce your assertions.
I'm sorry that you feel personally offended that some people have said less than stellar things about your golden calf. But about half the penances for all classes are poorly realized, and require essentially griefing your team, or bringing the overall experience down just so you can get another recolored shirt but with ONE extra pouch on it. Wowee.
And looking at your followup post where you preface by saying you don't want to be seen as "bull-shooting", it makes you seem desperate and defensive to be right. Even going so far as to provide anecdotal evidence of how, essentially, "I haven't experienced any of these scenarios, therefore they don't happen".
Sad, really.