Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Okay Thanks for your reply
Is there a how-to guide for this anywhere? This is one of the most attractive features of this game to me. I just can't find any good games with proper large-scale ai/bot matches.
It's kind of mind boggling how this isn't a thing yet. Holdfast had that same problem and it was such a shame. Both of the games are incredible and well made but the decision to not at all accommodate or prioritize offline gameplay in either of them is really unfortunate and kind of self-limiting for their success.
I can only imagine just how much bigger the playerbase would be if we were given even just a basic, watered down singleplayer experience. Verdun and Tannenberg were absolutely on point with the decision to give people the option and they still sell decently well because of it. I think that a not-insignificant proportion of people who would be into these kinds of historical games would prefer not to be forced into the somewhat arcadey and typical aspects of online play