Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell

Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell

there is really no reason why pandora tommorow is not on sale
the game is a freeware now since it isnt sold anywhere and the so called "game breaking bugs" are very easy to fix, just some files to replace and thats it. its not the same case as double agent which is almost unfixable and have tons of crashes.

therefore PT should be sold with 1 and CT as a trilogy. actually, PT is the best of that trilogy. not CT, CT is fine i guess but PT is way better in my opinion. both story and gameplay wise. its just underappriciated because its not on sale anywhere.

if DA is on sale despite it has no real fixes and PT is not that there is something really wrong here
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Ghidrah1 Mar 31 @ 6:15am 
Agreed, for me, the 1st 3 games are the best regarding game play and lack of errors.
DA also has an excellent story and game play but the errors are crushing regardless of the Xbox or PC versions
Babs Apr 26 @ 5:42pm 
Pandora Tomorrow is being censored from history by Ubisoft, nobody knows for sure but the general theory is, they are still upset and mad about the quality of the game since they outsourced it to a chinese studio that they never used again

PT is absolutely the worst of the first 3, 1 is better and CT is by far a million times better, you don't know anything you just grew up with PT. PT is not a bad splinter cell game, and it is not a bad game, but your nostalgia is wrong. You are thinking this way because you haven't had easy access to play it again. Actually do the work and find a PC copy of PT and you will remember how chunky it was
Originally posted by Babs:
Pandora Tomorrow is being censored from history by Ubisoft, nobody knows for sure but the general theory is, they are still upset and mad about the quality of the game since they outsourced it to a chinese studio that they never used again

PT is absolutely the worst of the first 3, 1 is better and CT is by far a million times better, you don't know anything you just grew up with PT. PT is not a bad splinter cell game, and it is not a bad game, but your nostalgia is wrong. You are thinking this way because you haven't had easy access to play it again. Actually do the work and find a PC copy of PT and you will remember how chunky it was

i finished pt few months ago and it still the gem that it was back then. its the best out of 3. CT is the overated one
Babs Apr 27 @ 5:37am 
You only think that way because you had PT when you were at the critical nostalgia age to accept it ie 11 - 14
Originally posted by Babs:
You only think that way because you had PT when you were at the critical nostalgia age to accept it ie 11 - 14

no i dont, pandora has the best levels and the best story.
Gonzo850 Apr 27 @ 6:34am 
Yeah the first three games are my favorites. I recently pulled out my old ps3 to replay Pandora Tomorrow. One of my favorites.
I remember reading somewhere that PT has a voice actor problem and that's why it was not released on steam.(Lambert had a different voice actor for some reason)

But, I'm not sure about that.
Dennis Haysbert did Lambert in PT did the others
Originally posted by Ghidrah1:
Dennis Haysbert did Lambert in PT did the others
From Lambert's wikia page
He was voiced by Don Jordan in Splinter Cell, Chaos Theory, Double Agent, and the flashbacks of Conviction, and is voiced by Dennis Haysbert in Pandora Tomorrow.
I know, I knew Haysbert's name but did't know Don Jordans's so I looked it up before responding to the post. Me broin shut off while I was typing and didn't realize I forgot to type his name out.
Maybe it's been deemed unpatriotic or (ideologically) dangerous?

Splinter Cell games have always, at least up until a point I mean, been deemed "realistic" in some aspects and this is maybe the crux of the issue?

Like why don't we see games like Splinter Cell and like for instance Rainbow Six games, how they used to be unlike today in which way they; these games and others are like "cartoons" or "popcorn" or "hamburger flicks":

big-budget, action-packed movies that are meant to be entertaining and easy to digest, rather than deeply thought-provoking. Some critics have also compared Marvel movies to "hamburgers", implying they are mass-produced, formulaic, and designed for broad appeal rather than artistic depth.

While such entertainment as today might be considered as "mindless entertainment" there might still be some cultural value attributed to it, but I'm not arguing this.

I am just curious why a game that otherwise is pretty much playable from start-to-finish in "freeware" form, isn't available to enjoy like through a certified seller like Steam or why they don't remake these "fun" (hehe) games how they were because what these games have been tackling and in which form this was I think gives us a glimpse into a techno-thriller aspect that isn't directly about fast, "satisfying" action à la Marvel movies or what have you but is rather a thought provoking and critical glimpse of the world or of a world at large.

Things have changed, sure. Things do change but not in such a fashion to totally exclude a portion or a type of entertainment that existed since its inception in a sort of "experimental" form. Personally I do not see a problem in this but...

I think that...

couple of silenced shots ring in the air.

a body drops to the floor. *thump
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Per page: 1530 50