Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
All 3 games in the trilogy were originally developed for PS2 then ported to other platforms (PC included) so your reasoning is not only biased but factually incorrect. Besides I don't think T2T looks worse (what follows is obviously just my opinion), to me it's a mixture of the oriental feeling of SoT and the darker undertones of WW. I like all 3 exactly because they are different enough to have their own distinct personality, yet connected in a way that makes the whole experience a complete one. WW has a special place in my heart because of its Metroidvania-esque gameplay spanning multiple timelines, but that's not a good enough reason to diss on the other entries in the franchise, especially when all of them are objectively solid games in their own right.