Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you want to play classic chess, there are innumerable existing good ways to do it.
The inability to play normal chess on this program should have no bearing on your desire to purchase it.
i have a few very lazy friends, who only play their games on steam. i really would love to have a sweet chess-game here on this platform too :) but i prefere playing in 2d - dont need this fancy 3d chess from nowadays :D
I don't think people normally see the leap from normal chess to variants as the difference between Halo and CoD. I used to think in a similar fashion, to use your analogy I would have once viewed 5D Chess as a Halo mod rather than a completely different game. To which the logic might normally follow that; If I pay $15 for this modification, can I still just play the base game? Of course the obvious answer here is as you implied; there are already so many free copies of normal chess that it would be wasted for the creators to implement it into their own project when so many great and feature filled iterations already exist.