Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
And I'm not even criticizing the game for it's graphics or gameplay I'm criticizing it for how demanding it is and would expect much better because of it's graphics you know just like you with Wilds.
Look at my post history dude it's all there for you viewing.
I literally started the post like this(Graphics can be forgiven if gameplay is good but why does a PS3 gen looking game so demanding.)
People don't remember what PS3 games looked like - texture res alone is significantly higher than what was ever possible on that console. People can argue about art direction and nostalgia, but this game looks decent by modern standards with the right settings. Technical issues aside. I mean this was never a AAA high budget game to begin with, but I do agree that it should run much better for how it looks.
I guess I just do the classic Agree to Disagree.
.. AND THEN SOME .👇😆
https://youtu.be/lSzTfUFiV48