Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Creating a bottom-end low-poly Quest version will completely turn this awesome game into garbage. Even my phone is faster than the laughably slow XR2 Soc (Adreno 650 gpu) in the Quest 2. My RTX 3090 is 30 times faster than the Adreno 650, or the Adreno 650 is just 3% of the RTX 3090. Never suggest using Adreno 650 if you care for great VR. 2c.
I guess you need a faster router with wifi 6.
And guys, stay friendly, we are a big VR family...
My reason is a bit different : my 70 years old mother loves VR puzzlers. This game would be right up her alley. She even bought a Quest 2 to play them, cause gaming PC a bit to complicated for her.
Also, graphical style seems possible to simplify for quest limitations without killing the game. I mean, fisherman tale or red matter worked very well as Q2 titles. So why not ?
Remember. Not everyone shares your experience and circumstances.