Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
That's the general critical and user consensus. ME1 is slower, clunkier, and a lot of parts feel sort of empty and barren, though it has a spectacular ending and a lot of good world building.
ME2 is damn near a perfect video game in almost every way. If there's anything to criticize it would maybe just be that the areas feel a bit smaller and more linear than ME1 (but MUCH richer and more detailed in return), and I think the main plot / villains are slightly weaker, but the companion quests which are the focus of the game are consistently excellent and varied. The game is satisfying and relatively polished from beginning to end.
ME3 comes very close to topping ME2 in terms of the sense of scale of the conflict, with a galaxy at war and everything, and so many great story threads started in 1 and 2 get resolved quite satisfactorily... then the ending happens... and, well, it's controversial, so that alone knocks it down below ME2. There are some mods that "fix" the ending if you're into that though, haha.
Finally, MEA simply feels like a different franchise altogether (because it kind of is) made by a completely different development studio (because it kind of was) and while the combat gameplay is undeniably the best yet, and the environments are gorgeous, it just doesn't have the life and character or polish of the trilogy. An argument can be made that it's actually better than ME1 in many ways though, given that, like ME1, it focuses on big open-world exploration, but does it better. So still worth a shot.
It also slowed down combat for me as well, enemies became bullet sponges and you were so restricted in your powers and weapons compared to before. You could fully mod up your weapons and make some killer tools, you could combo your powers together in great ways.
Then 2 hit and suddenly you can shoot one power off and maybe a comrade has a power that syncs with it and it makes a little "poof" that does some bonus damage. Firefights drag on longer as a result of that and the ammo, so you are swapping weapons because suddenly your future weapons can no longer cool off on their own.
I can see people liking it as it took it from an rpg shooter to an arcade shooter though, so if thats more your thing the games will get better soon for you.
That said, ME1 does have the most balanced gameplay, if the least flashy.
2 feels better, having more towns, and side quests are either much shorter, or are intimately tied to your party, so they feel more Story Rich. (Gameplay is a bit too simple for me though)
3 improves that even further. It does a fairly good job of remembering your past decisions and loading you up with lots of good little story beats, and a few really really good ones.
And the combat is almost back to ME1 levels of tightly balanced, with a whole lot more flashiness.