Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And that the two games would be very different from each other
I've bought Sons of the Forest, played for couple days co-op and left it unspoiled for a complete story experience. I don't know how long it will take to release 1.0 but I don't mind waiting for years and then I'm gonna play it. I just want it to be good and well thought. Devs usually don't think about the best quality when they force themselves to catch the project deadlines; I can give thousand examples where the deadlines caused release of unfinished, untested, unfixed products which every player hates way more than delays.