Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You and me both, the developer doesn't seem to think it's important though. Major oversight if you ask me.
Arrika as a female gamer, I prefer to play as females. However not being able to choose my character isn't going to be the reason I don't play the game...
I just hope it doesn't p*** off other races/communities. White's playing as blacks, blacks playing as whites. (add in more combos) etc. Some people can't even play their main DnD characters on twitch, due to their character being a certain skin tone and people being sensitive. I can't wait for that stuff to chill.
The game just needs to be fun and engaging enough :)
I have been gaming for decades and have played as characters of practically every type imaginable and it has never once been an issue if I can't play as a character that reflects who I am, who I feel I am, what I look like, or what I want to look like.
For me it's all about the gameplay and having fun, not what that pixel person (or thing, or creature, or alien, or whatever) I am controlling looks like or what pixel bits they have, or don't have, especially in games that only have limited options.
Of course there is absolutely nothing wrong with having preferences, and most of us do, but avoiding a game that might be really fun to play just because the characters don't look the way you want them to look or have the body type/shape/colour/etc. that you want them to have? That's absurd. It's like refusing to play Monopoly because you can't be the hat or refusing to play Yahtzee unless the dice are blue with red pips.
No, they don't need to let players choose their character if the game has multiplayer. It's not a necessity. It's a nice option to give players, but it's not required at all.
They don't need an excuse. If the developers choose not to add that option for any reason, or for no reason at all, then that's their decision to make.
Ever play Rust? It solves this issue by randomly assigning you a character. No one gets to choose anything about their character. My character looks absolutely nothing like me. If the game had a character selection option or character creation system I doubt I would have made that specific character. Being "forced" to play that specific character and having no choice in the matter does not affect me, or the gameplay, at all. it is a non-issue there just like it's a non-issue in this game. It's just a pixel person in a video game, it is not you or a representation of who or what you are.
I've been gaming since the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 70s. What does how long you have been gaming have to do with anything child? You think you can establish your self as some sort of "authority" by mentioning that? Authoritarianism is the inability to think for yourself, you are literally asking an authority for your opinion. So don't try that trite with me.
Yeah, it really is. It's called good game design. If you are unable to give players a customizable character in multiplayer you make the character as neutral as possible. You don't give the character a name, or a face. There's a reason many multiplayer games have the character wearing a helmet that covers the entire face, and bulky body armor that hides any details of the physique, it's so they don't have to worry about character customization. Most games that do that, eventually make an obvious female variant as an update later. But if your multiplayer game can't pull the bulky body armor and opaque helmet cheat, and has human characters, you offer at least a small selection of characters. You don't just ignore half the human population.
Their excuse can be seen in how most of the women are represented in the game. They are either, easily forgotten mentions on a scrap of paper or a photo, dead, cannibals, or mutants. It's gross misogyny. Silence can speak just as loudly as an actual statement.
Nope, can't say I have, because every time I look at the youtube videos of Rust, all I see of a pure shooter with a very poor build system tacked on. PVP is for children. Adults value cooperation and creation. I'm sure it's very popular with kids. I've even seen a few excellent builds in screenshots, but the majority of the players build nothing but a ramshackle arrangement of walls, with no apparent rhyme or reason other than getting higher to snipe other players. That's not my play style. I'm an explorer and creator.
As for being forced to play a man on SOTF or Rust not affecting you? How unsurprising that a man wouldn't be bothered by not being able to play as a woman. Maybe if a multiplayer game had you playing only women, and not even scantily ones, then you might have a problem. In fact from what I've seen of the toxic masculinity that is so rampant right now, I'm almost certain it would. You'd quit the game rather than keep playing as a woman.
If you don't want character customization? Fine, but stop ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ at people who do. Would adding character customization hurt you? No. Would it help those who want it? Yes. Does your attacking people who want it help anyone? No. Does it cause harm to attack people who aren't causing harm? Yes. So, pull that stick out of your ass, and stop being a little ♥♥♥♥♥ towards women.