安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
That they even added hotkeys so quickly after the complaints is a step up for them honestly. That took a long time requesting for it to finally get added in The Forest.
They almost never communicated with thier EA community in The Forest and we were pretty lucky if they added to something that was spoken about. I can honestly say that I could count thier replies over the 2 years I spent invested in the EA on my fingers alone.
I personally had a massive in depth analysis of the game difficulty in terms of survival and combat and very well recieved suggestions among the community that massively helped to influence the eventual hard mode addition to the game, but it wasn't perfect and needed some tuning, which was completely ignored in favor of things like sliding down hills on a turtle shell which dumbfounded the EA community.
We asked over and over about how the strength building system worked in The Forest EA, since it was never actually disclosed in detail and the 2 comments from the developers across the years were extremely vague and never clarified - which was shocking for such an important mechanic in the game.
After a year or so myself and others in the community finally figured it out 100% through a massive amount of testing and conversing on the forum and then I wrote up a guides on it so people could finally understand it, only to have the developers suddenly and without any warning, remove the system a week later and replace it with the current energy burning version. Which was more of a tedious chore than anything compared to the original system - and wasn't a well recieved change.
So yeah, don't get your hopes up that the negative reviews will change anything unless they all spam the exact same problem. The devs can filter for negative reviews only, if they want to actually look for constructive criticism.
Same.iam not that familair with the serie i discovered the first Forest because of the trailer from the this one a month ago. It was only 5 bucks on the ps store but apparantly i already had it. For free or 5 bucks i thought it was a pretty descent potentional start to a franchise and a sequel that wasn't that limited in buildings/creatures/craftables. But wauw 25% copied and 10% new like a fish trap but it's still not even functional only decorative. Game looks way better wich really isn't a accomplischment.
it only u feel annoyed by that
Can u find me any game out there where I can build and eat meat out of my hand like Red Dead 2 but in First person? This is great early access game that no game out there like it. If there any game that daring to put little details like this. It would be super pop by now
Also, you do know that game developers don't read Steam user reviews, right?
The game was announced dec 2019. Thats 4 year and it has not been released yet. You can participate in the Early Access now. Come whine back when the game is released. Compare it when its done and not still in development
For me its a The forest remake in early access.
People have different expectations, opinions and like different things.
Also, i don't know what the heck you're on about with your $50 price example, cause it's not even close to that pricepoint.
If you have a weapon then press scroll upwards to use the iron sights
I've heard this be called a "positive review bomb" but positive reviews aren't really regulated as obviously they are positive and why would anyone bother to do such a thing other than ToS violations?
I think this game also had around 5,000-10,000 reviews not even in the first hour because everyone wanted to be the first to say something funny
There's no option as far as I can tell to just simply leave your rating and go, you usually have to comment something, and I think that is where this comes from, so people write some BS and don't actually give details on the game. Reviews do it, and it's especially annoying when the curators do it
Focusing on a few flaws and forgetting all the goods the game is adding.
Better and smarter AI, AI companion better graphics, new monsters, new craft mode, a new island, full campaign, and even a pretty smooth experience for a release. + instead of releasing the game as a 1.0 as it was expected, the format of early access will help to structure the game. (=quality improving over time)
I sometimes can't believe how people feels the need of not recommanding a game just because they have found flaws.
Worse, people talk about how a product should be after years of development without even knowing how tedious making a game is nowaday. Specially after two years of COVID.
They are fine with its current state, which sucks.
The map is too large and empty.. The gps just tells you where to go so nothing is unknown or left to be scouted for.
I seriously doubt the devs are willing to cut down the map size.... And it was such a bad decision for them to make it this big.
A handful of testers would have told them it was too big.