Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In-game you have to outmaneuver them and depend more on AT field guns and especially the Stuka. The AT rifle and many of the tank shells are going to be weak/useless against them.
The other French tanks, the FT-17s, are basically meme tanks that can be easily destroyed by anything.
Interesting note, the few successes the French enjoyed while suffering defeats was massed tank attacks by a Colonel named Charles de Gaulle.
The "small groups" thing is a bit of a partial explanation, in fact on 10 May 1940 the Char B1 bis tanks were all concentrated into 3 armored divisions (the infantry branch's Divisions Cuirassées/DCRs), while the SOMUA S35s were concentrated into the other 3 armored divisions (the cavalry branch's Divisions Légères Mécaniques/DLMs).
However, the three DCRs were not grouped into an armored corps but instead held in reserve before being deployed in separate sectors along the Meuse (as was de Gaulle's later 4th DCR) and once in combat, none of those divisions had adequate communications equipment, so many of the tanks had no way to remain in constant contact to coordinate movement and action as well as the Germans could. The end result is that while they were not initially deployed in small groups, by nature of how a battle played out and attrition, they ended up that way. The 1st and 2nd DCR were also not helped by circumstance, both being crippled by the shifting frontlines before they could even hit the field.
Having existed for longer before the war, the 3 DLMs fared better as coherent units, but they were committed to the northern Belgian front and destroyed in the Dunkirk pocket, and so were strategically less important than the DCRs facing the German breakthrough at the Meuse.
Now, the most numerous tanks in French service were the light R35s, and those were indeed spread across the entire frontline in single battalion-sized units as infantry support. However, this was not due to any significant doctrinal difference, simply that the R35's armament was completely unsuitable for any concentrated armored breakout formations. The main reason they had been adopted at all was because they could be efficiently/cheaply put together by reusing the cannons from France's huge arsenal of decrepit FTs. France had a significantly weaker economy and industrial base than Germany, so they were always trying to recycle things whenever possible. But that was being done parallel to - not instead of - the formation of the DCR and DLM armored divisions.
I enjoy the firepower and weak armor of the Pz.II. But the lack of ammo makes it very difficult to not run out by the missions end.