Game length

[Capt. Slappy]

How long is this bad boy gonna run me?

[DeathSpectrum]

reviews are saying 2-3 hours for the campaign

[Capt. Slappy]

Originally posted by DeathSpectrum:

reviews are saying 2-3 hours for the campaign

Just as short as Guns and cannoli, for real? At 17.99? good lord

[Metalmaggus]

oh man 2-3 hours is too little.

[Capt. Slappy]

Originally posted by Metalmaggus:

oh man 2-3 hours is too little.

It wouldn't be so bad if the price point matched the content.

[Gray Knight]

if you play on hard and use the OP gun i found you can beat the game in about an hour and half or way less.

[Duncan]

Originally posted by Gray Knight:

if you play on hard and use the OP gun i found you can beat the game in about an hour and half or way less.

what is the OP gun (so I can run it for achiev)

[THE GARY(The Free K!ll)]

People crying about the length need to think, 2-3 hours before replay isnt bad. a stake dinner cost more an you eat it in abot 10 mins.

[Jigg]

Yeah game length is super dissappointing. I wanted more. I guess it's worth the price but I feel like they could have done more with it.

[Leftnode]

if you play mp, extend gameplay to 10 hours from dc issues. you're replaying stuff you've already done... but it's gameplay right?

[Commander Hitman2b]

3 hours for the campaign would replay it in coop

[Capt. Slappy]

Originally posted by THE GARY(The Free K!ll):

People crying about the length need to think, 2-3 hours before replay isnt bad. a stake dinner cost more an you eat it in abot 10 mins.

A solid point. However, I just dropped 10 bones on Cultic, which has over double the content here. I know these lads can make a solid game as I have both of the Guns Gore and Cannoli games, but they absolutely would not stand up to a solid cut of beef. If or when this game goes on a deep sale, I'll absolutely pick it up. 17.99 is not a worth 3 hours of game play nor is the base price of 19.99.

[The Greatest Pokedad]

Rating a game by dollars to hours is a pretty crappy way to decide what's worth your money.

There are plenty of games that take 2-3 hours to play start to finish and are great for replays, co-op, hard mode, challenge runs, etc.

[Capt. Slappy]

Originally posted by The Greatest Pokedad:

Rating a game by dollars to hours is a pretty crappy way to decide what's worth your money.

There are plenty of games that take 2-3 hours to play start to finish and are great for replays, co-op, hard mode, challenge runs, etc.

No price is certainly a major factor in any kind of purchase. There is a reason why I do not buy delicious NY strip steaks every night. Outside of the heart stopping deliciousness the price isn't worth the amount of content. This game at 3 hours base content x 2 for a difficulty up swing still isn't worth the asking price. I paid significantly less for a different product that provides double the content at the same bench mark in quality (If the reviews are to be believed). I dont care if it is good, it is currently overpriced for what it provides.

[theo]

Since you mentioned strip steaks, I'll make another comparison.
I decide if a drink is worth my money by measuring the amount of alcohol per $. Because that's the only quality I care about. But obviously this is a method worth laughing at.
Same goes for you.
In case with video games, I look at many things other than gameplay hours. Setting, aesthetics, design specifics, authors, etc.
This game is disappointingly short but for me, subjectively, it was well worth the money by all other means.

[DasaKamov]

Originally posted by THE GARY(The Free K!ll):

a stake dinner

I'm a vampire, so "stake" dinners are bad for my health.