MULTIPLAYER OR RIOT!!!

[Streetguru]

MULTIPLAYER OR RIOT!!!

[Dr.Arxangel]

Multiplayer can be added later. I'm waiting for singleplayer

[Awawawa]

At the very least we get the campaigns and skirmish mode. The campaigns actually really helped add to the story in The Crusaders.

[MainBranch]

These posts are not funny.

[The Dragon King]

if i can have the game without multiplayer ♥♥♥♥ it then i rather have it with no multiplayer ( riot ) then with multiplayer

[Firaeveus Carron]

Another port with cut (multiplayer) content.


Cool beans.

[hobajeba9]

without multiplayer its not even the full game. What is this crap. WE NEED MULTIPLAYER. The campaign in these games was never where the game really was popular. Not having multiplayer in 2020 is absolutely a disgrace and a complete money grab.

[Firaeveus Carron]

Originally posted by hobajeba9:

without multiplayer its not even the full game. What is this crap. WE NEED MULTIPLAYER. The campaign in these games was never where the game really was popular. Not having multiplayer in 2020 is absolutely a disgrace and a complete money grab.

They probably don't want to pay for servers. The multiplayer code is there and we could even make do with just LAN. We have multiple means of emulating LAN connections over the internet, including Steam's own Remote Play feature.


Either way, I think it's disgusting that remasters and remakes are cutting features and game modes.

[Streetguru]

Originally posted by Firaeveus Carron:

Originally posted by hobajeba9:

without multiplayer its not even the full game. What is this crap. WE NEED MULTIPLAYER. The campaign in these games was never where the game really was popular. Not having multiplayer in 2020 is absolutely a disgrace and a complete money grab.

They probably don't want to pay for servers. The multiplayer code is there and we could even make do with just LAN. We have multiple means of emulating LAN connections over the internet, including Steam's own Remote Play feature.


Either way, I think it's disgusting that remasters and remakes are cutting features and game modes.

Valve has servers they can use or they can just make it P2P only? or allow people to make private servers?

Could also just use a virtual network as well for LAN

[Firaeveus Carron]

Originally posted by Streetguru:

Valve has servers they can use or they can just make it P2P only? or allow people to make private servers?

Could also just use a virtual network as well for LAN

The Steam Client has a remote play feature that people can use to play LAN games over the internet with each other. I'm not sure if it supports all games, but it doesn't really matter considering that we can emulate LAN via other means.

[Geist]

To me the strong point of this one was the multiplayer. But eh. I will get it regardless.

[[K9]-Ŧƛ§§àĐǟʁ]

masterpiece

[777eza]

There won't be multiplayer, store page says singleplayer and the fact is blueside isn't in the best situation, KUF2 went through development hell, and is only mediocre. For online to be secure by today standards they would have to rewrite a chunk of it and I don't think they're willing to do that given there current finances. I'm just happy crusaders made them enough money to port heroes over as well.

[Streetguru]

The profits from the crusaders should have been plenty to setup basic P2P stuff?

KUF 2 should have been just cut off long ago when it was supposed to come out on the PS3 given how it ended up lol.

[Val]

We need multiplayer. How expensive is one global server and making it P2P? It will give the game much needed longevity.

[RedAugustus]

They are not adding multiplayer to a ten year game. This isnt like starcraft or warcraft of any game like that. I want to play multiplayer too cos I never did on the OG xbox but its a fat chance if they will.

Fingers crossed tho.