Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
He's right.
Civilization VI was an embarrassing launch. And the game never improved. It was unsalvageable from the start.
Which is why this game is such a threat. They revamped the game and fixed every single problem that I can think of, eliminated the defects, and implemented improved mechanics on top of that.
Developers don't often do that. They simply copy-paste a sequel and breed more of the same. Like Creative Assembly does with their mind-numbing series of war games.
This time he, and many others, will be proven wrong. It's Assassin's Creed: Valhalla all over again. Hatred before launch and record-breaking sales when the dust settles.
Gamers are depleted of trust, understandably. They have nothing left to give.
Enter Civilization VII and Assassin's Creed: Shadows.
Those two games will prove a lot of people wrong.
And it'll be fun to watch.
But the general point is true, for as long as I can remember each new civ game released to disappointment, only to overtake the previous and become popular after a DLC or two. Given the limited number of civs in each age, as well as the large changes, I think it's likely it will follow the same pattern here.
We'll find out soon enough.
I think you need to reread this part of your reply, except slower this time.
Only the first line is correct.
Its 2k, they're practically up there with Ubisoft for price gouging on launch.
The thing is though, Civ has always been a patient gamer's type of game, you can usually grab a series plus its DLC for next to nothing if you're content to wait 6 or so months.
I still can't believe ubisoft thought a game centered in japan and having the main protagonist be a black guy who hunts down the japanese for sport was a good idea, it already would have been badly recieved in japan and now japan is also dealing with a flood of black and somali nuisance streamers straight up going to japan to rob stores for fun and other rude things.
Don't forget it's not even a good depiction of Yasuke, but one based off the fetish fan fiction novel by a "historian" that went to Japan, saw that there's like two mentions of Yasuke in all of actual Japanese history as a bodyguard, and then wrote a massive book about him being a samurai retainer.
Oh and the African American fetishising by the developers who had remixed American Hip-hop with Japanese instruments as his boss battle music. Because, you know, black is black obviously, no difference between Black Culture in America and African culture from hundreds of years ago, surely.
AC being a poor representation of history is nothing new. iirc Ezio Auditore died with the rest of his family in real life, but in the well received AC2 he went on to beat up a pope shooting magic missiles by duplicating himself with a magic apple, after which he got a magic message from a magic alien.
Stupid ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ series.
As for Yasuke, It's just another smokescreen to try and keep the heat off their sexual predator paradise. Comparing 2K with Ubisoft ain't right. 2K is a whoreson company trying to turn games into cash deposits and children/the vulnerable into gambling addicts. Ubisoft is far, far worse. They'd rather sink their entire company than stop helping rapists.
I've said before, but I think Civ 7 will be good at launch despite 2K, or bad because of 2K. The devs seem to have done a good job, but 2K is definitely gonna try as much ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ as possible.
Correct, the guy you replied to does not know that because he does not actually play any of the assassins creed titles enough to even know that every playable character was fake until the shadows disaster.
Its why i get annoyed when devs try to cater to people who do not play their titles and never will.