Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
it's 50-50 at the moment.
Civ V is considered to be the very best Civ ever by a lot of folks who don't like Civ VII. If you really like Civ V, just play it and be happy. Nothing else matters.
Could there be a Civ V remaster in the future? I have no idea as I'm not a developer. I'm sure the idea has been floated and if they thought there was more money to be made from doing so than other projects, absolutely, they would. On the other hand, we haven't had a remaster of the earlier Civs.
If one game could really do with a remaster, it's Civ 4.
Mechanically that game as it exists now is absolutely amazing and offers a whole lot more variation and depth that any of the last 3 Civilization games.
All that it really needs is a update to the base engine to work around some limitations it imposes in terms of memory management and the like, and opening the game up to be more modifiable graphically.
The community would then sort out the rest as it already is still doing and make Civ 4 with mods even more outstanding then it already is.
Firaxis significantly changing the underlining foundation of Civ 7 is never going to happen though.
It would set off those that enjoyed the game as it was and trigger a "This isn't the game you sold me that I gave you money for" meltdown.
Plus it would be seen as Firaxis essentially admitting that the game was inherently flawed at a core level and that they made bad decisions.
Best course of corporate-action is to either double down on what they have and just develop it further, or if the projected return on any further significant investment is seen to not warrant that then shift the project to maintenance mode in 14-16 months after the existing DLC cycle is concluded.
I'd rather a Beyond Earth 2 than a SMAC or Beyond Earth remake/remaster anyway. So I'm glad they're always moving forward.