I hope they don't drop the series after CIV 7 flop

[Bigboss PC Faster]

Relic made one mistake and we never saw Dawn of War again

[taomastercu]

I mean that's different because WH40K was not Relic IP.

[Mountain Man]

1. Civ 7 is not a flop.

2. I guarantee that in six to twelve months after patching and expansion packs, we're going to see a bunch of second look reviews that will start with, "You know, maybe I was too harsh on Civ 7 when I first reviewed it..."

[Wish Bear]

This "game" was more disappointing than Sim City 2013. I still think about how bad that was 12 years later...the death of an IP.....this game is so bad I had to check if it was EA or Ubisoft.

[seven_stars]

Originally posted by Wish Bear:

This "game" was more disappointing than Sim City 2013. I still think about how bad that was 12 years later...the death of an IP.....this game is so bad I had to check if it was EA or Ubisoft.

Make sure to leave your negative review. Its the only to change this mess.

[AdahnGorion]

They wont.
The next iteration will be in 8-10 years and by then people will buy on name alone again

[taomastercu]

Originally posted by Wish Bear:

This "game" was more disappointing than Sim City 2013. I still think about how bad that was 12 years later...the death of an IP.....this game is so bad I had to check if it was EA or Ubisoft.

Sadly we had several historical 4x games launch within the last few years but none of them were the Cities Skylines(1 anyways) to Civ's Sim City 2013.

[Sesikee]

I'm actually hoping 2k gtfo. They're greedy slugs. Sid Meier cashed out and we're left with a steaming pile of crap.

[Wish Bear]

I kinda hope the makers of Grim Dawn and Farthest Frontier step into the civgame arena....

[taomastercu]

Originally posted by Wish Bear:

I kinda hope the makers of Grim Dawn and Farthest Frontier step into the civgame arena....

Crate making a 4x? Sure but it won't be historical so probably not a competitor to Civ.

I'd *love* a 4x set in the Grim Dawn world, though.

[🥇 Xaxoon 🥇]

It could happen that this heralds the end of the CIV series. Because this is about stock market values. About money. Investors will not risk the developers producing such rubbish again and failing again.

[Sesikee]

Originally posted by 🥇 Xaxoon 🥇:

It could happen that this heralds the end of the CIV series. Because this is about stock market values. About money. Investors will not risk the developers producing such rubbish again and failing again.

developers are definitely at fault but I would say the lion share of the blame goes on Ed Beach.

[Joker of Souls]

Originally posted by Mountain Man:

1. Civ 7 is not a top.

2. I guarantee that in six to twelve months after patching and expansion packs, we're going to see a bunch of second look reviews that will start with, "You know, maybe I was too harsh on Civ 7 when I first reviewed it..."

except the core of the game is crap. unless they add a game mode to remove Civ switching in every era it will always be crap

[Many-Named]

Originally posted by taomastercu:

Originally posted by Wish Bear:

This "game" was more disappointing than Sim City 2013. I still think about how bad that was 12 years later...the death of an IP.....this game is so bad I had to check if it was EA or Ubisoft.

Sadly we had several historical 4x games launch within the last few years but none of them were the Cities Skylines(1 anyways) to Civ's Sim City 2013.

This. Nothing has really replaced Civ so far, that's why it's not gonna fail the same way.

[Wish Bear]

i know. I've bought them all. i hope a replacement for civ5 comes along one day.

[Ðe§er†FoX]

Originally posted by Wish Bear:

i know. I've bought them all. i hope a replacement for civ5 comes along one day.

So you just want civ 5 again with a new number next to it? That makes a lot of sense...