Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Particularly you can keep very experienced Commanders (if you have any), i.e. General and Admirals with all of the Promotions that they earned. A Strong Commander can have a lot of promotions. I am only Turn 51 in Age of Exploration and my 1st Legatus (Roman Commander) is now at level 6. With Xerxes DEAD at my hand.
Plus you earn a lot of special bonuses that improve your Leader/Civ in the next Age(s) during the Transition between 2 Ages.
I had a very active Military 2nd half of Antiquity and the 1st part of Age of Exploration.
During which I conquered ALL of Xerxes (7 Settlements of which I kept 6 and Razed one of them). Leaving me with 15 Settlements as of Turn 51 in the 2nd Age. The other 8 Settlements I built myself.
I was playing As Benjamin Franklin as Rome and the Normans, who is not at all a typical Warlord in terms of his abilities.
As of Turn 51 I have a level 6 Commander, a Level 4 Commander, and a Level 3 Commander. They all started in the 1st Age as Roman Legatus type Commanders.
I carried over those 3 Commanders and 12 additional military units from the 1st Age to the 2nd Age because of those Commanders. They played a major role in my defeat of Xerxes.
You would have a VERY hard time trying to defend against an Invading Army lead by those Commanders, unless you had several experienced Commanders of your own.
Here is my Level 6 Commander.
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/55834678229766467/D0C6617C52FBDC2ABB25F29E39E3356D0A8CE649/?imw=5000&imh=5000&ima=fit&impolicy=Letterbox&imcolor=%23000000&letterbox=false
and here are my Bonuses that I earned during the 1st Age, that I got at the Start of the 2nd Age.
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/55834678229829129/B172FCAD3657E40C48803A5118C18574D4E8F913/?imw=5000&imh=5000&ima=fit&impolicy=Letterbox&imcolor=%23000000&letterbox=false
So apparently Civ 7 is basically Civ 6 Domination Victory Only, LOL. Is there any point in Wonders at all?
My bad, I should have noticed that first before commenting.
I found a good article dated 6-Feb that was more complete than the Civilopedia page.
https://www.pcgamer.com/games/strategy/civilization-7-age-transition-effects/
As (like me) you've played a lot of Civ 6, I would recommend you be cautious about Civ 7. A lot of features from Civ 6 are missing, poorly implemented, or poorly described. The Age transition is unlike any other Civ game and is intended to 'reset and level the playing field'. A Steam commenter described it as a tennis match with three sets.
One missing feature that bugs me is that the loyalty feature from Civ 6 is not there and the AI will forward settle you. The developers stated on 11-Feb that they want to address AI forward settling in the AI engine rather than add the loyalty feature.