Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
it is like you may want to play one way, but the game will hold your hand. it has very specific chores for you to do. the era will end and upon the next turn you will find everyone is once again even, your progress negated. the end game ai is like raging barbarians have taken over a civ, a 1 tile city in the middle of the ocean became a torrent of ships making the game feel like an rts or td game at times. perhaps this is something you will like.
But, if like me, you were looking for the same freedom afforded by the sandbox style of previous titles than it will be best to wait or avoid it altogether
I like they changed it up.
I Def have that "one more hour" feeling.
Each new release of Civ is always a bit jarring. I'm 65 now, having been playing Civ since the beginning. III to IV was a big change, as was IV to V and V to VI. Lots of new things were added each time (sometimes good stuff, sometimes not), and lots of stuff removed (sometimes for the good, sometimes not). V didn't really shape up for me until Brave New Worlds (which I still play, turn-based with 2 others), and VI didn't really shape up for me until Gathering Storm (which I still play, turn-based with 1 other).
I was hoping (vainly) that the developers, while making something new, had worked with alpha and beta players enough to make sure important stuff wasn't lost (or mislaid). I was hoping that VII would be richer than VI (which ultimately was richer than Vi, and so on), but that's not the case ... yet. There are definitely some stuff really not fleshed out properly. A good example is when negotiating peace, the only thing you can offer or demand (at least in the Age of Antiquity, I've not been in the other ages yet) )are whole settlements .... no tributes of gold, resource, influence, great works, etc. That's a loss of finesse ... what in Civ VI was deeper is now clunky and shallow in VII. Hopefully things like this, and others (big and small) will be addressed by the developers and the richness brought back.
Still learning this one, and will continue to do so. Whether it will be added to my play-list permanently still remains to be see. It has the bones of the core concept, and there is some meat here, but it needs to be better cooked and seasoned.
That said if you don't play it as a Civ game and just treat it like a new age specific game (or 3) then there's plenty of enjoyment to be had. Just try not to think about Civ. Its just such a shame as it could so easily have been the best game in the series.
The UI is bad and simply leaves too much unexplained. I had to restart 2-3 times just to learn basics the UI doesn't convey. Fortunately, there's already a UI mod that adds tooltips that fill most of the holes.
I think if you loved Civ 5 or 6 and mostly want just a new version of those games, then you may struggle with this game. But it's been a welcome change for me.