Civ VI still reigns supreme. VII most refunds ever ? Whaaa?

[Lord Haart]

So, an unfinished, buggy mess.

Then there's Denuvo, thats a no no. Then the huge cost, and so many things missing.

Then a 2k account, then all the other stuff missing. This is lite. Civ lite.

Not even the British Empire, the most successful in history, is in-game from start, oh no, some dlc or something. Bah humbug !

This so far for the time has the most returns of all.

LOADS @ our place are proper disappointed and are returning to 6 in DROVES.



What do YOU think ?




Many thx.

[Martin]

Best Civ ever made. End of. Bye.

[Evrach]

Civ VI sure still reigns for now, no doubt. This civ VII has flaws (gosh, this UI...) and like every Civ game since Civ 3, needs some added content to be at its best. But it’s really a good game, really fun to play. The core gameplay mecanisms are pretty solid and I have no doubt it will be a great game with time. Greater than Civ 6 or not, it’s too soon to say.

[wildcardbitches]

I think most civ players would say V>VI

[Brakiros]

the 'advanced access' con allows refunds until the delayed release date so people have clearly taken advantage of it this scam costs $160 AUD for playing on the real release day. It's such a massive joke and they deliver a buggy cut content game only allowed 8 civs on the map normal maximum and no common civs like England and also missing the last era. They've gone full greed and it shows

[Oaks]

I'm having a great time with 7. I don't think it's entirely fair to compare a just released game with other games which have had years of content and support.

[Brakiros]

Originally posted by Oaks:

I'm having a great time with 7. I don't think it's entirely fair to compare a just released game with other games which have had years of content and support.

Civ 6 had significantly more content at the start compared to this bare bones full greed title, the only thing functionally wrong with Civ 6 was its AI was functionally broken. The game itself was good Civ 7 is far from good

[Lord Haart]

Originally posted by wildcardbitches:

I think most civ players would say V>VI

DoomstaX nasty but.

[Oaks]

Originally posted by Brakiros:

Originally posted by Oaks:

I'm having a great time with 7. I don't think it's entirely fair to compare a just released game with other games which have had years of content and support.

Civ 6 had significantly more content at the start compared to this bare bones full greed title, the only thing functionally wrong with Civ 6 was its AI was functionally broken. The game itself was good Civ 7 is far from good

I disagree, I'm having a great time with the game as is. People are going to have different opinions.

[monkeypunch87]

Originally posted by Lord Haart:

Originally posted by wildcardbitches:

I think most civ players would say V>VI

DoomstaX nasty but.

Civ V doesn't have doomstacks...

[Eldrin]

VI has never reigned supreme at any point in time.

[Intellyless]

Originally posted by Brakiros:

Originally posted by Oaks:

I'm having a great time with 7. I don't think it's entirely fair to compare a just released game with other games which have had years of content and support.

Civ 6 had significantly more content at the start compared to this bare bones full greed title, the only thing functionally wrong with Civ 6 was its AI was functionally broken. The game itself was good Civ 7 is far from good

Instead of the content of civ6, you mis here, there is other content that you don't see because you don't own the game.

[Rampage]

rofl 6?!

Either civ 2 or 4 is the best, 6 doesnt even come close. But yeah 7 is the worst by far, its not even civ

[YouHaveNoPrivacy]

Originally posted by wildcardbitches:

I think most civ players would say V>VI

For the most part, I agree. If you favour playing against people online rather than solo, then Civ 5 is a better experience. If you prefer solo play, I think Civ 6 is better for it's far greater variability.

Civ 7? ... all I can say, is that I hope they do better. The solo experience is fairly fun, but there's just SO MUCH missing... it had so much promise. I'm a little sadge about it.

[Rampage]

Originally posted by YouHaveNoPrivacy:

Originally posted by wildcardbitches:

I think most civ players would say V>VI

For the most part, I agree. If you favour playing against people online rather than solo, then Civ 5 is a better experience. If you prefer solo play, I think Civ 6 is better for it's far greater variability.

Civ 7? ... all I can say, is that I hope they do better. The solo experience is fairly fun, but there's just SO MUCH missing... it had so much promise. I'm a little sadge about it.

civ 6 solo is absolute trash mate.... you must play it like sim city or something because the AI is a joke. You might as well be alone on the map

[gromenawer]

I can't wait to buy the Monetization Age DLC pass, and I will buy twice to stick it to all of you racist.