Crises !!!

[yellowdog20601]

I have played with Crises on and Crises off, To play a game for three hours, building up my civilization and army, then the "age" changes, most of my army/navy wiped wiped out, forced to change my civ and start over ... very disappointing, BACK TO CIV 6 !

[bjorkwolf]

That's not a crisis (well, it is, but not affected by the on off switch. More crisis because designed that way). That's just what happens at the end of an era.

[PhalseDemeise]

that age change is a killer. it don't even let you keep your increased settlement count.
really makes everything you just did in the previous era feel pointless

[yellowdog20601]

Game play is the issue, I never played for a cheap quick win, I enjoyed building and developing a civilization founded on a leader, his/her civ, and its historical context, researching and developing tech, building a military and government for the long haul. I am 68 and have been paying Civ for a very long time ... this version is very disappointing...

[yellowdog20601]

Ok, I read and listened ... I played the game through the crises mode and the age change. I do agree that Civ 6 can become functionary deep into the game in that the AI Civs tend to become stagnate and the end is inevitable. A restart via a new age and crises does keep the challenge alive. That being said, I do wish we could maintain consistency with the civ and leader throughout the game...