Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A pity that would drop the ball on that now.
I've seen multiple people say the tutorial system is strong, even if the ui info system needs work. Is that relevant to a new player? Something to think about.
Adding, "If we never get another Dragon Age, at least it went out on a high note."
---
It's reasonable to think that because the game will take over two years to complete, it doesn't deserve more than a seven. But damn, the potential for an 8 is certainly there.
The two expansions will tell all.
Listening to a developer speak yesterday about the future of Civ VII, all he could say was, "It will change."
That means no more Giant Death Robots. Looking forward to see what they add.
Hoping for SupCom-style Experimentals.
I can live with all kind of imperfections besides this one. A studio that feel the need to dumb down information available on a game like Civ doesnt deserve my money.
I'll gladly buy the game once it's fixed and i can find every info I need ingame though.
Learning how to play the game from someone who knows defeats the point of playing the game?
A german reviwer said there are information, but they are not needed. You can play the game on normal difficulty without knowing everyrhing detail. Thats more important for high difficultys and when you want every advantage you can get.