Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A good Ymir can wreck everyone.
As a good other champ but having arthur or izanami against a good thanatos, ymir, thor, you'll get ya ass whooped
The current #1 and #2 in 1v1 play Ymir and not Ama. Maybe need to spend less time complaing and scapegoating and more time getting good.
And ymir appears 11 times in top 50 while ama appears 34 times. I played 4 hours today, only 2 matches not against her. This is the kind of stats you should be looking for.
In any PVP games, if a champ is strong or broken, most people will go for it. Best example is league of legend with champs being very popular when they are in S+ tier and when they fall to D tier, nobody play them anymore.
There are 59 Amaterasu players on the top 100 1v1, only 15 Ymir players. There are 3 Ymir players in the top 10, 7 Amaterasu players, again, Ama is just a better character... It's not about skill, it's about unbalanced characters, but I guess you like telling ppl to "git gud", don't you?
I play Thor and have no issues with random Amas I meet, because you won't run into top 50 Amas every single match, your description of the very best means nothing in the average-day queues. I personally don't even think this game is balanced for 1v1, I feel it was added for the novelty, the feeling of competition where your character pick makes too much of the difference.