Digital Foundry XSX vs XSS Review

[PSYCHE_1701]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm4uNK5ydGw&ab_channel=DigitalFoundry
Hope you like it :)
Edit: Hope it will show better how we are achieving rendering two worlds at the same time ... ugh ... :|

[NexonSU]

It's a joke? "HOPE YOU LIKE IT"?

[Sing kit]

Originally posted by NexonSU:

It's a joke? "HOPE YOU LIKE IT"?

what do you expect them to comment? hope you enjoy? hope you dislike it? bruh it a different port lol of cuz they hope that you enjoyed watching how the game perform on other ports.....

[Drakelstorm]

Excuse me developers. While the game itself is great the performance on PC is abysmal. A GTX 3090 barely pulls 60FPS in most occasions. Is there anything that can be done to improve optimization?

[Mephisto-Luzifer]

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

A GTX 3090

Would better buy a RTX 3090 dude..

[danygia]

That's very bad to know that Series X is more powerful than 3070 to 3090 GPU for 500 €.

[Drakelstorm]

Originally posted by Mephisto-Luzifer:

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

A GTX 3090

Would better buy a RTX 3090 dude..

You know what I meant. Seriously nitpicking.

Originally posted by danygia:

That's very bad to know that Series X is more powerful than 3070 to 3090 GPU for 500 €.

It only runs better because the graphics are FAR worse. The console versions have almost no lighting effects and the textures are abysmal. Just look at the Digital Foundry Xbox Series X vs PC comparison. It also runs at 900p on the Series X while on Series S it runs at Sub-HD.

"when exploring in split-screen mode, the minimum resolution drops further. On Series X, the lowest case is around 900p while the Series S equivalent is 648p"

While you're trying to compare a PC that's trying the run the game in split-screen mode @ 1440p or 4k.

[danygia]

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

Originally posted by Mephisto-Luzifer:

Would better buy a RTX 3090 dude..

You know what I meant. Seriously nitpicking.

Originally posted by danygia:

That's very bad to know that Series X is more powerful than 3070 to 3090 GPU for 500 €.

It only runs better because the graphics are FAR worse. The console versions have almost no lighting effects and the textures are abysmal. Just look at the Digital Foundry Xbox Series X vs PC comparison. It also runs at 900p on the Series X while on Series S it runs at Sub-HD.

"when exploring in split-screen mode, the minimum resolution drops further. On Series X, the lowest case is around 900p while the Series S equivalent is 648p"

While you're trying to compare a PC that's trying the run the game in split-screen mode @ 1440p or 4k.

Here Series X has much better graphics, maybe that's because they're using an old GPU but it's still more expensive than Series X.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyVKogiYJ60

[Drakelstorm]

Originally posted by danygia:

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

You know what I meant. Seriously nitpicking.



It only runs better because the graphics are FAR worse. The console versions have almost no lighting effects and the textures are abysmal. Just look at the Digital Foundry Xbox Series X vs PC comparison. It also runs at 900p on the Series X while on Series S it runs at Sub-HD.

"when exploring in split-screen mode, the minimum resolution drops further. On Series X, the lowest case is around 900p while the Series S equivalent is 648p"

While you're trying to compare a PC that's trying the run the game in split-screen mode @ 1440p or 4k.

Here Series X has much better graphics, maybe that's because they're using an old GPU but it's still more expensive than Series X.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyVKogiYJ60

Or maybe it's because that reviewer turned off most of the options that make the PC version look better. I don't see any Ray Tracing and other features are missing.

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-20201-the-medium-tech-analysis-a-deeper-look-at-xboxs-first-next-gen-only-game

Idk how you can think 900p and other issues plaguing the console version make it look better than the PC version.

The reviewer also claims that's it's captured at 4k when the game on consoles doesn't even run close to 4k. So please explain that.

Here's a more accurate representation of the game on Xbox and PC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhA5KDii-GQ&ab_channel=Games2Day

[danygia]

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

Originally posted by danygia:

Here Series X has much better graphics, maybe that's because they're using an old GPU but it's still more expensive than Series X.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyVKogiYJ60

Or maybe it's because that reviewer turned off most of the options that make the PC version look better. I don't see any Ray Tracing and other features are missing.

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-20201-the-medium-tech-analysis-a-deeper-look-at-xboxs-first-next-gen-only-game

Idk how you can think 900p and other issues plaguing the console version make it look better than the PC version.

With these settings on The Medium would be unplayable, barely hit 15-20 FPS throughout the game if you don't play at 1080p.

[Drakelstorm]

Originally posted by danygia:

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

Or maybe it's because that reviewer turned off most of the options that make the PC version look better. I don't see any Ray Tracing and other features are missing.

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-20201-the-medium-tech-analysis-a-deeper-look-at-xboxs-first-next-gen-only-game

Idk how you can think 900p and other issues plaguing the console version make it look better than the PC version.

With these settings on The Medium would be unplayable, barely hit 15-20 FPS throughout the game if you don't play at 1080p.

Um, I was just watching Dis2 playing on those settings with an average of 30fps and consoles dip down into the 20s which is barely playable. So I have no clue what you're talking about.

[Mephisto-Luzifer]

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

Originally posted by Mephisto-Luzifer:

Would better buy a RTX 3090 dude..

You know what I meant. Seriously nitpicking

Dont be mad, i just wasnt abe to hold it back

[uinon]

What is the update about ?

[Kraehe]

Finished it today in Xbox, the two World visualisation was great, like the whole game.

One of the best games i played the last months

[Josting Ray]

It is very poorly optimized, we need an urgent patch, the game to me with an I7 with an AMD Rx of the newest goes to 58 and suddenly in zones it goes down to 19 and 9 fps Wtf and when it is put in spiritual mode not to mention it is unplayable Please developer take out a patch because you can't enjoy it like that to a title that we have been waiting for a lot I have 20 of ram

[ℬℓα⊂₭ ℙℜ¡ℵ₠]

Originally posted by Drakelstorm:

Excuse me developers. While the game itself is great the performance on PC is abysmal. A GTX 3090 barely pulls 60FPS in most occasions. Is there anything that can be done to improve optimization?

Do you have a G-Sync monitor? They certainly help with the 'smoothness' of the game when it goes under 60fps.