Store Page
GWENT: The Witcher Card Game
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

GWENT: The Witcher Card Game

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
o-trushin May 22, 2021 @ 11:42am
there should be a "bad game" option
that will give developers information about what decks players dislike. also if a player presses a "bad game" against specific fraction, system might just search matchup with differenr fractions. that just makes sence, because if 2 cards in, for example, millfgaard counters my deck that just not fare.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 18 comments
Ruf May 22, 2021 @ 12:10pm 
They will learn anything about that. Because most of people are arrogant and just don't like what they lose against, meaning, everything.

And they know everything already by seeing what people play the most or the less. That why they buff Lippy like 6months in a row. And if they play like 1week at Gwent, they could realise by themself that the game is cancer. No need stats to see that.

And honestly, they don't have too look what random players thing about the game. They have to look what happen in pro game tournament and what they think, and most important listen to them.
Last edited by Ruf; May 22, 2021 @ 12:15pm
#1
DT May 22, 2021 @ 12:15pm 
What this 'bad game' option do?
Steal you opponent resources and gave it to you, opposite of 'good game'?
Everyone going to give you BG instead of GG then.
Last edited by DT; May 22, 2021 @ 12:16pm
#2
o-trushin May 22, 2021 @ 12:16pm 
Originally posted by Ruf:
They will learn anything about that. Because most of people are arrogant and just don't like what they lose against, meaning, everything.

And they know everything already by seeing what people play the most or the less. That why they buff Lippy like 6months in a row.
they can take track of only players who do not pres bg after every loss. or players who press sometime gg after loss
#3
o-trushin May 22, 2021 @ 12:17pm 
Originally posted by Abyssien:
What this 'bad game' option do?
Steal you opponent resources and gave it to you, opposite of 'good game'?
nothing. may be plays a loud annoying sound for the opponent
Last edited by o-trushin; May 22, 2021 @ 12:18pm
#4
DT May 22, 2021 @ 12:20pm 
It pointless. Everyone going to BG you if you not GG them. At worst someone going to troll BG you even if you GG them. :steamsalty:
#5
o-trushin May 22, 2021 @ 12:23pm 
Originally posted by Abyssien:
It pointless. Everyone going to BG you if you not GG them. At worst someone going to troll BG you even if you GG them. :steamsalty:
actually, the amount of trolls is will be way smaller than amount of players who will just gg every time. or bg after every loss.
#6
Ruf May 22, 2021 @ 1:07pm 
if you want the real bad play option, there is the red thumb from steam
#7
pale_horse May 22, 2021 @ 4:15pm 
Originally posted by Abyssien:
What this 'bad game' option do?
Steal you opponent resources and gave it to you, opposite of 'good game'?
Everyone going to give you BG instead of GG then.

GG does not "take your resources". Did you think that it does?

In theory it could provide some real information if they through a data scientist at it and collected for a while (they would be able to try and sift out "just mad" and so on from the stats and matchups, as well as history per-playerID).

I doubt they have the resources to put towards this considering ... everything else.
#8
Kmpat May 22, 2021 @ 6:28pm 
Dev already know it's anything involve Nilfgaard.
#9
o-trushin May 23, 2021 @ 2:05am 
Originally posted by Kmpat:
Dev already know it's anything involve Nilfgaard.
the only one who suffer against nilfgaard are the ones who never played them. I klimed to pro last month with NG(imposter ball, mill, clog) and skellige eist. And now nilfgaard is not very powerfull. they just overbuffed other fractions. I climb ladder as skellige witchers and can outplay nilfgaard. I know what they have in decks, what they have not, and what should i be aware of
#10
Lagrange May 23, 2021 @ 3:41am 
If its one thing the dev team should do, its NOT take advice from salty people like yourself and ruin the game on reactionary whims. Study the game, watch streams, and get better at deck building and sequencing instead of crying about it. If something is OP, the devs have more than enough resources to regulate it.
#11
o-trushin May 23, 2021 @ 3:46am 
Originally posted by Lagrange:
If its one thing the dev team should do, its NOT take advice from salty people like yourself and ruin the game on reactionary whims. Study the game, watch streams, and get better at deck building and sequencing instead of crying about it. If something is OP, the devs have more than enough resources to regulate it.
dude, you are salty. i just do not like unwinable matchups. and that is the problem of every card game, but gwent suffers the most. I just said that the option to mark the games you do not like can show the developers something. And i would not like to against the deck i will 100% win. I am playing for fun and neither winning, nor loosing 100% time against any deck is fun
#12
pale_horse May 23, 2021 @ 3:47am 
Originally posted by Lagrange:
If something is OP, the devs have more than enough resources to regulate it.

"OP" is not an issue.

I know how to win. I am not finding the game fun enough to care as much any more.

Too many people worry about "just win". Its a game. I have a hundred other things I can be doing. If it is not fun why would I bother with this?

Also - streamers are bad examples. Some of them are obviously sick of playing (if you see them long enough you can tell), but their games are monetized and depending on where they live its worth it to just suffer through and pretend. The same reason the top players rarely come from the US. The prizes are a lot of money in some countries, and mean almost nothing in the US compared to the time sunk into playing.
#13
o-trushin May 23, 2021 @ 3:57am 
Originally posted by pale_horse:
Originally posted by Lagrange:
If something is OP, the devs have more than enough resources to regulate it.

"OP" is not an issue.

I know how to win. I am not finding the game fun enough to care as much any more.

Too many people worry about "just win". Its a game. I have a hundred other things I can be doing. If it is not fun why would I bother with this?

Also - streamers are bad examples. Some of them are obviously sick of playing (if you see them long enough you can tell), but their games are monetized and depending on where they live its worth it to just suffer through and pretend. The same reason the top players rarely come from the US. The prizes are a lot of money in some countries, and mean almost nothing in the US compared to the time sunk into playing.
thats what i was talking about, playing game is about fun, not about winning
#14
Kmpat May 23, 2021 @ 6:36am 
Originally posted by o-trushin:
Originally posted by Kmpat:
Dev already know it's anything involve Nilfgaard.
the only one who suffer against nilfgaard are the ones who never played them. I klimed to pro last month with NG(imposter ball, mill, clog) and skellige eist. And now nilfgaard is not very powerfull.

Not talking about power-level but about "fun" the most importance thing in any game. When you Kingslayer opponent's Viy, Feign Death or Alchemist Vernossiel, Eist that not fun and also didn't mean your are a better player than the opponent just mean that you got lucky to eliminate opponent win condition without them can do anything about it.

NG can have a power-level of current SY for all I care (NG is one of my favorite factions by the way) as long as their gameplay stay on the board and greyard not inside the deck where the opponent can not prevent or counter it. Also I'm not the one who create a topic about "bad game option" and "system search match up with different factions" that sound pathetic coming from a "Pro Player".
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 18 comments
Per page: 1530 50

GWENT: The Witcher Card Game > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: May 22, 2021 @ 11:42am
Posts: 18

Discussions Rules and Guidelines