Expecting info on next dlc soon.

[zmanbuilder]

I'm looking forward to the nerud expansion, nerud is my favorite area, theme wise that is, i do not like the over world of it.

[Forge Master]

Likely won't happen till next year?

[zmanbuilder]

Originally posted by Forge Master:

Likely won't happen till next year?

All dlc will release within one year of the games launch, it may be delayed, but not by a year.

[Peredur]

I would guess September for the next DLC.
They took 4 months for the first DLC and 5 for the second.
3 months seems a bit short to complete the dev of a DLC of similar size as the previous ones.
4 months would mean a release in August. But with July-August, I would expect devs to take some time off. And August is a bit slower for communication and sales.
Hence September.

[fergurburger]

One year from the release date was the promise when they falsely advertised it. Had to wait till their deadline essentially to release the 2nd. Also the 2nd dlc was pretty underwhelming in comparison to the awakened king

[Neyreyan_Youtube]

I think they will announce the release date of the dlc at the end of the month.
Or search on their discord/reddit, the devs are active there, shielded by their mad max like thirsters waiting for their water😬
All jokes aside, the devs are not communicating with us on the platform they use to sell their products and its a problem.
They usually announce the dlc 2 weeks ahead of release so there is no chance its coming this month.
Gaming companies have the best life they are never held accountable for what they say or do😬👍

[Morty2989]

A roadmap or general plan is not a knife you get to hold to the dev's throat. They already gave everyone DLC info and look at how they are reacting to it. Why would you ever expect them to give you more ammo for your tantrum?

[zmanbuilder]

Originally posted by mmmPenguin:

A roadmap or general plan is not a knife you get to hold to the dev's throat. They already gave everyone DLC info and look at how they are reacting to it. Why would you ever expect them to give you more ammo for your tantrum?

So we cannot hold them to their word then?

[Neyreyan_Youtube]

Originally posted by mmmPenguin:

A roadmap or general plan is not a knife you get to hold to the dev's throat. They already gave everyone DLC info and look at how they are reacting to it. Why would you ever expect them to give you more ammo for your tantrum?

Mmm yes but they gave the deadline themselves and it was tied to the extortion edition.
So while pleb and legacy edition users won't complain, the people who bought the ultimate edition are upset because it was clearly an important factor in buying it.

[Albireo]

Originally posted by zmanbuilder:

Originally posted by mmmPenguin:

A roadmap or general plan is not a knife you get to hold to the dev's throat. They already gave everyone DLC info and look at how they are reacting to it. Why would you ever expect them to give you more ammo for your tantrum?

So we cannot hold them to their word then?

No. A promise is not a contract. Even as a breach legal doctrine still holds that time needs to be given to remedy the issue. Basically even from a legal or responsibility perspective "♥♥♥♥ happens" and more time can be used, so simple lateness doesn't mean anything until it becomes excessive. So what is excessive? original 1 year time limit sets our range, previous DLCs took 4 and 5 months is our context, 4 would have been spot on for everything in a year. Still they could go 6 months and not bat an eye i imagine, 9 without causing a scene.

[zmanbuilder]

Originally posted by Albireo:

Originally posted by zmanbuilder:

So we cannot hold them to their word then?

No. A promise is not a contract. Even as a breach legal doctrine still holds that time needs to be given to remedy the issue. Basically even from a legal or responsibility perspective "♥♥♥♥ happens" and more time can be used, so simple lateness doesn't mean anything until it becomes excessive. So what is excessive? original 1 year time limit sets our range, previous DLCs took 4 and 5 months is our context, 4 would have been spot on for everything in a year. Still they could go 6 months and not bat an eye i imagine, 9 without causing a scene.

You do not need to shill for the corporations, if they lie, it means they lose the trust of their customers.

[Albireo]

I'm not shilling nor did i make any statement about trust. You asked if there was any method to "hold them to their word" basically pressure or force them into backing their side of a deal. As noted even if you would add pressure the lateness aspect cant change, no one can turn back time. And any solution implemented also would take time. Simple lateness does not mean anything.

[Urazz]

Originally posted by fergurburger:

One year from the release date was the promise when they falsely advertised it. Had to wait till their deadline essentially to release the 2nd. Also the 2nd dlc was pretty underwhelming in comparison to the awakened king

I don't think they falsely advertised it. They most definitely intentionally did intend to release all 3 within a year. At best, I think they should apologize for not meeting the deadline they made and announce the release date for DLC 3. Maybe even talk about the future of Remnant 2 after the release of DLC 2 or if they are planning on a Remnant 3.

[zmanbuilder]

Originally posted by Urazz:

Originally posted by fergurburger:

One year from the release date was the promise when they falsely advertised it. Had to wait till their deadline essentially to release the 2nd. Also the 2nd dlc was pretty underwhelming in comparison to the awakened king

I don't think they falsely advertised it. They most definitely intentionally did intend to release all 3 within a year. At best, I think they should apologize for not meeting the deadline they made and announce the release date for DLC 3. Maybe even talk about the future of Remnant 2 after the release of DLC 2 or if they are planning on a Remnant 3.

A slight delay is expected, i'm mostly just expecting info, a teaser, something to get the hype up. Maybe they will do another aberration event to get people playing.

They set the expectation, and that is why i returned, noticed the last update for the game was a while ago, so i assume they are doing work fully on the dlc.

I'm very interested in what the new archetype will be, cannot wait to dissect the teaser for it.

[zmanbuilder]

Last update was May 9th, and the game has been silent for over a month, so i assume they have all hands working on the dlc.

Plus there is likely going to be a balance overhaul again too.

[johnwick]

Originally posted by Albireo:

Originally posted by zmanbuilder:

So we cannot hold them to their word then?

No. A promise is not a contract. Even as a breach legal doctrine still holds that time needs to be given to remedy the issue. Basically even from a legal or responsibility perspective "♥♥♥♥ happens" and more time can be used, so simple lateness doesn't mean anything until it becomes excessive. So what is excessive? original 1 year time limit sets our range, previous DLCs took 4 and 5 months is our context, 4 would have been spot on for everything in a year. Still they could go 6 months and not bat an eye i imagine, 9 without causing a scene.

This is nonsense. Maybe stop giving bad legal advice and focus on the game.

For anyone who purchased the DLC bundle or Ultimate Edition of the game that included this consideration, the promise you are referring to is a consideration, the all DLC for free in a specific time, something of value in return for accepting the offer.

Remnant II® DLC Bundle (3 DLC Packs)

Details to be announced.
All DLC released within one year of launch

Contract formation in UK/US law. CONSIDERATION

US example: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/consideration

UK example.

In common law, a promise is not, as a general rule, binding as a contract
unless it is supported by consideration (or it is made as a deed).
Consideration is "something of value" which is given for a promise and is
required in order to make the promise enforceable as a contract. This is
traditionally either some detriment to the promisee (in that he may give
value) and/or some benefit to the promisor (in that he may receive value).
For example, payment by a buyer is consideration for the seller's promise to
deliver goods, and delivery of goods is consideration for the buyer's promise
to pay. It follows that an informal gratuitous promise does not amount to a
contract.