Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That said, People can say whatever they want in a review. Its their money.
Me? I see 160 hours of playtime and think 'they got more than their money's worth.' and treat it like a positive.
To be fair the handler was kind of annoying, she was kind of a nothing character. Clementine has had two games and dlc to develop so I think it's not a fair comparison, she was kind of alright. The ending as it stand was kind of unsatisfying though.
It is a stupid review but does not qualify as something to ban. People who are able to make their own opinions will simply scroll by the comment.
Personally, if the, game has 95% positive or more, I buy without reading any review ( if the game appeals me).
Otherwise, I read negative ones trying to find similar reviews, in order to better understand the game cons ( obviously, there will be rants and silly ones, but you can just avoid them).
A review like "Not worth $60, should be $50" has no bearing on the game itself so you have to sort out the crap to get to the real stuff.