Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The ambiance and the world design is worth so much more than the story and that's well in evidence here so I wouldn't say you need the play the first game.
https://youtu.be/np0NxcF-3Sg
This script is thick. The lore of remnant: From the ashes
https://youtu.be/F9BzdyueMf0
These two questions might be slightly different than the thread topic but I figured it would be safe to ask here instead of making a whole new thread.
Takes place 10 years after Remnant, so technically 30-50 years after Chronos.
Its still a direct sequel since its following up from the ramifications of what happened after the real ending in the second expansions.
I highly doubt it, the second game is already a mile improvement over the first in certain ways, sticking to 2 is just fine