Reviews are not looking to good

[Saica-Fox]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RITsn5YH-NE

[Mikoto]

lol gamespot

[Countdown]

It's been getting 9/10 across the board. There will always be outliers.

[^7rrr^5a^6u^5l^5i^6e^7lul]

Originally posted by Mikoto:

lol gamespot

do you only "Lol gamespot" when you don't agree with the scores?

[eggman1993]

Sounds like the reviewer really likes it and thinks it's a significant improvement on its predecessor. It's sitting at 80 on metacritic. What's the problem exactly?

[PovKetz]

"Reviews" is definitely a really interesting way of spelling one singular review I'll give ya that. Here is a list of scores I found that someone posted on like twitter or something. I dunno

9 - IGN
9 - AltChar
9 - Noisy Pixel
9 - Shacknews
9 - WhatIfGaming
8.5 - Destructoid
8.5 - CGMagazine
8.5 - GamingTrend
8 - PCGamesN
8 - GamingBolt
8 - VideoGamer
7 - Gamespot
6 - JeuxVideo
4/5 - AOTF
4/5 - Hardcore Gamer

Metacritic: 80

Opencritic: 82

[MrWitz]

7/10? In what world is that "not looking too good"? Besides, overall, it's receiving on average 8-8.5, some even rating it 9 (IGN). It's doing very well with the reviews right now.

[Viper]

Since almost every review was a 9 or 8,5 I do not put very much importance on this review at all. 2 below average reviews in the whole bunch is of no concern. Your title should have been this review did not look very good. Saying"reviews" is incorrect information.

[Mikoto]

Originally posted by ^3P^5P^6P^3AULIE:

Originally posted by Mikoto:

lol gamespot

do you only "Lol gamespot" when you don't agree with the scores?

Do you actually think every review site is worthy of being treated with respect? If so, you probably enjoy kotaku who tried to get FF16 canceled and accused Nintendo of being, what did they say again? xenophobic or bigots when they promoted the theft of their games? It was something really stupid and it does not matter which one it was because it is kotaku, you could say anything stupid and go "sounds right"

[4accenter]

"Reviews are not looking to good" by one review. Thanks to PovKetz for more opinions.

[sadman]

Nah. Its 9, 8/10 mostly so idk what you want more. I am sure this game gonna be fun, interesting

[Odoyle]

"Remnant 2 is the kind of sequel that improves upon its predecessor in almost every facet. The third-person gunplay has been tightened up and refined, there's more color and variety to its diverse locales, and the various RPG elements and character progression have been greatly expanded upon, giving you more options to construct a unique build along with the incentive to delve into the game's near-limitless replayability."

Yeah that review opening definitely doesn't sound good at all. Time to refund.

[The Ultimate Despair]

Originally posted by ^3P^5P^6P^3AULIE:

Originally posted by Mikoto:

lol gamespot

do you only "Lol gamespot" when you don't agree with the scores?

I ALWAYS 'lol gamespot'. I also always 'lol IGN'. Because their reviews are hardly ever relevant.

[Vex]

So if Gamespot says you have to jump off a cliff you'll do it? Cause that's how you're acting. It's time to start having your own opinion

[Das Trojanische Pferd]

wow there are still people that give a ♥♥♥♥ about the review sides?

[Captain Blud]

Originally posted by PovKetz:

"Reviews" is definitely a really interesting way of spelling one singular review I'll give ya that. Here is a list of scores I found that someone posted on like twitter or something. I dunno

9 - IGN
9 - AltChar
9 - Noisy Pixel
9 - Shacknews
9 - WhatIfGaming
8.5 - Destructoid
8.5 - CGMagazine
8.5 - GamingTrend
8 - PCGamesN
8 - GamingBolt
8 - VideoGamer
7 - Gamespot
6 - JeuxVideo
4/5 - AOTF
4/5 - Hardcore Gamer

Metacritic: 80

Opencritic: 82

Rock Paper Shotgun gave it a bestest best award