Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Dont bother shooting if the target is heading at an angle away from you ie a diverging course
Best line up for torpedoes is if the target is heading towards you at an angle to pass infront of you ie a converging course.
And I do all that. aiming bow just ahead of target,
target is aproaching at a angled line so that the torpedoes would be almost perpendicular to the target's course at impact,
range is rather close to under 2 kms.
almost the ideal condition for a sub attack
oh and the target is a large battleship heading in a straight line
it's almost a aiming practice kind of condition and...somehow 6 torpedoes in a 8degree spread would completely miss that target to the rear...
burh
A good spread angle is about 2-0.5deg per 1000yds range, 8 deg is a lot.
Also be aware that it may be a converging course when you fire but then turn into a diverging course when the torps get to the target.
1. No, they didn't know there was a sub in the water till a torp went boom
2. I know 8 degree is a lot. I did that because I was firing from 4 subs at a closely packed concoy of 8 ships. I hoped spraying torps would get lucky hits on transports once they missed the intended military vessle.
I wouldn't be surprized if the torps were so wide that it missed by going pass either side of the target. But the reason I'm so confused is that despite all these idea conditions, despite the angle beaing so wide, they missed completely to the aft of a slow moving battleship.
3. I am aware of that. And as I said, to maximize chance of hit, I time exactly the torps to hit as the converging course would turn into diverging course - thus hitting the targets perpendicular.
like 15%? wouldn't go higher
You should be getting 90+% at that range.
Something is wrong there. Low visibility? Bug?
maybe cuz it was night?
Yeah, all that and I assume they didn't identify the target ship? That tends to make a significant difference with subs to get a better idea of what they are shooting at.
Definitely sounds like they were in bad conditions, or didn't give the crew time to build a better solution. You never want to fire early unless you are about to lose the ability to fire at all.
Just want to point out its a common mistake to think lo g lance torpedoes were used in Japanese submarines.
They were only used on imperial navy surfface vessels.
The 'Type 93' or 'long lance' was only used in surface ships, yes. It was to big to be used on subs.
But a downsized version of it, the 'Type 95' was used in submarines as main weapons.
Needless to say the 'pure oxygen' design which gave the 'Type 93' it's famed abilities was retained.
And so the 'Type 95' had better range, speed, stealth abilities then allied counterparts.
Just like how 'Type 93' was against it's counterparts.
So if by the term 'long lance' you are reffuring to 'the long range and fast and invisible damn ♥♥♥ torps' you can say that ♥♥♥ subs used long lances too.