Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not reading your schizo waterfall.
Thomas Lindgren and Fredrik Malqmvist acquired stocks allegedly having non-public insider knowledge, to make some cash on the side. They are accused with proof of being inside traders.
Mats Juhl was so incompetent as a CEO that he got those two caught.
End of story
Let me burst your bubble here, ladies and gentlemen; Shaw's story doesn't quite add up if you know how the stock market works.
See, what happens when you issue more shares (as SBZ announced last week) you get a phenomenon called Share Dilution; because there are now more shares, each existing share has less (voting) power.
What happens as a result of that is that your existing shares suffer devaluation, and the more capital you try to raise, the worse the devaluation gets.
And these shares were already worth exactly nothing.
I've noted many times in this forum how SBZ's shares are all worth a few cents each at best, so I'm not going to re-tread that part, because no one's getting rich selling these shares, PERIOD.
But what I will point out is that in this case, a couple hundred K in shares would be about what you would NEED to retain as much voting power as these guys previously held.
As much as Shaw may think this is somehow some big scoop... it's really a nothingburger.