PAYDAY 3

PAYDAY 3

View Stats:
< >
Showing 1-15 of 22 comments
It is a long read but it is totally worth it. This deserves attention. This isn’t about drama, it’s about accountability and transparency for investors, devs and players alike.
LMS  May 14 @ 3:20pm 
runs in the family
flaphead May 14 @ 3:25pm 
Tl;dr. If it's SHARTWHEEZE BAD then... WE KNOW. Couldn't give two ♥♥♥♥♥ about "transparency" or whatever.
Originally posted by flaphead:
Tl;dr. If it's SHARTWHEEZE BAD then... WE KNOW. Couldn't give two ♥♥♥♥♥ about "transparency" or whatever.
yes, we know, but we are finding out that they might have allegedly been involved in more criminal activity than the Payday Gang itself
This is something that the community already talked about 6 months ago when Connor made the video. Tho it probably got forgotten since alot of it was padded out by petty stuff and schizophrenic political ramblings.
flaphead May 14 @ 3:55pm 
Originally posted by the_schattenjager:
Originally posted by flaphead:
Tl;dr. If it's SHARTWHEEZE BAD then... WE KNOW. Couldn't give two ♥♥♥♥♥ about "transparency" or whatever.
yes, we know, but we are finding out that they might have allegedly been involved in more criminal activity than the Payday Gang itself
Ok, and? It ain't about them going bankrupt and it ain't about them releasing quality products so who gives a ♥♥♥♥?
Not reading your schizo waterfall.
Originally posted by flaphead:
Originally posted by the_schattenjager:
yes, we know, but we are finding out that they might have allegedly been involved in more criminal activity than the Payday Gang itself
Ok, and? It ain't about them going bankrupt and it ain't about them releasing quality products so who gives a ♥♥♥♥?
Not reading your schizo waterfall.
I read it and I liked it :steamhappy:
flaphead May 14 @ 4:03pm 
Originally posted by Moray Eel:
Originally posted by flaphead:
Ok, and? It ain't about them going bankrupt and it ain't about them releasing quality products so who gives a ♥♥♥♥?
Not reading your schizo waterfall.
I read it and I liked it :steamhappy:
So maybe you can give me a tl/dr so I can sh!t on SBZ in new and imaginative ways?
Originally posted by flaphead:
Originally posted by Moray Eel:
I read it and I liked it :steamhappy:
So maybe you can give me a tl/dr so I can sh!t on SBZ in new and imaginative ways?
TL;DR starbreeze is even dumber and shadier than most people realize, so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ on them is even more justified and funnier :Pizza:
Last edited by Moray Eel; May 14 @ 4:05pm
Originally posted by Moray Eel:
Originally posted by flaphead:
So maybe you can give me a tl/dr so I can sh!t on SBZ in new and imaginative ways?
TL;DR starbreeze is even dumber and shadier than most people realize, so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ on them is even more justified and funnier :Pizza:
Mf is acting like this is new news or something
flaphead May 14 @ 4:07pm 
Originally posted by Moray Eel:
Originally posted by flaphead:
So maybe you can give me a tl/dr so I can sh!t on SBZ in new and imaginative ways?
TL;DR starbreeze is even dumber and shadier than most people realize, so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ on them is even more justified and funnier :Pizza:
Anyway, I hope that OP thing makes them go bankrupt faster, ta!
tl;dr;

Thomas Lindgren and Fredrik Malqmvist acquired stocks allegedly having non-public insider knowledge, to make some cash on the side. They are accused with proof of being inside traders.

Mats Juhl was so incompetent as a CEO that he got those two caught.

End of story
Zappron May 14 @ 10:14pm 
Originally posted by flaphead:
SHARTWHEEZE
best thing to come from this L thread
Insider trading seems to be a common theme amongst Starbreeze (and OVK) employees 🤠
Oh Shaw, you silly goose...

Let me burst your bubble here, ladies and gentlemen; Shaw's story doesn't quite add up if you know how the stock market works.

See, what happens when you issue more shares (as SBZ announced last week) you get a phenomenon called Share Dilution; because there are now more shares, each existing share has less (voting) power.
What happens as a result of that is that your existing shares suffer devaluation, and the more capital you try to raise, the worse the devaluation gets.
And these shares were already worth exactly nothing.
I've noted many times in this forum how SBZ's shares are all worth a few cents each at best, so I'm not going to re-tread that part, because no one's getting rich selling these shares, PERIOD.
But what I will point out is that in this case, a couple hundred K in shares would be about what you would NEED to retain as much voting power as these guys previously held.
As much as Shaw may think this is somehow some big scoop... it's really a nothingburger.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 22 comments
Per page: 1530 50