Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Build tower with ladder facing outside fence and another from inside fence.
Solved.
Now take your elitist base construction techniques somewhere else.
I've seen some of the better designed bases crumble for this reason and seen some of the crappiest designs withstand the wave because some were actively repairing during the scan.
Very much this tbh.
Combat repping is vital regardless how you set the base up. It's one reason I'm of the camp that you keep the bases as simple as possible, to make repping faster and safer....not always viable of course, and I'm fully aware of the arguments against this.
What it comes down to is the team itself. How many people are repping? How many need to? (based off how efficiently the bugs are getting killed). How safely can this be carried out without allowing the waves to build up etc. etc.
The only way to really test this is when you start getting 16 player pre-made teams running multiple organised tests in hard mode...not something I've heard about yet tbh
You are wasting tower for nothing . A tower in the middle of the base provide no tactical advantage and most of the time people won't even go there . The fence have weak durability and the bug will take down both tower and fence in no time .
A tower should be around outer defensive wall to be able to shoot at whatever directly beneath the wall , or provide a park out point to get into building rooftop for Bastion and Operator .
You get about 8 towers, they are cheap and most teams barely even trooper up in 2 of the 8 that get spammed around the base.
Now take your elitist base construction techniques somewhere else.
You want to repair the ARC as fast as possible ? Slap the gate with 3 walls , way cheaper than 4 elec fence , you can shoot from the wall , you can climb the wall .
The mission is to delay the bug from getting to the ARC as long as possible , all tools have to be used , the elec fence and turret is the most expensive pieces therefore you gotta build it right so it can pay its cost , or else it will be just useless decoration .
4 elec fence around ARC help no one , 4 elec fences placed in chokepoint help even new guy who just install the game .
No, it doesn't solve anything. I've already seen that kind of things done and it doesn't work. Often bugs prevent you from even reached it if badly placed. E-fences around the ARC prevent you from doing something really important : repairing it and move freely inside your base. Because, yes, sometimes e-fences block entire parts of your base when the ARC is in a bad spot. It cause all sorts of problems, so stop doing it, it's not about elitism, it's about not wasting valuable ressources. When we have to gather ressources, I often play operator and after a run with small groups to the farest ressource collection point, risking my life to bring back two canisters, I'm very pissed to see clowns wasting my 4000 ressources (2 canisters) to build nonsense.
When I see that kind of things, I just stop my canister's run and I let others gather ressources themselves, so they'll learn the value of it and maybe they'll be less eager to waste it the next time ...
Trying to do things good (not even optimized, just good) = "you're an elitist". The reality is these peoples don't care about other's efforts and want their fun without bringing anything to the team. That's why I ignore their insults, it's irrelevant, just an excuse for their lazyness.