Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There are Improvement Shovel Points for this and that's a perfect way to use them.
Why do we need Engineering XP to cut down a forest, in fact engineering should be used to reforest an area that has suffered from a massive logging operation.
I am amazed how people simply accept such blatant disregard for my most precious Engineering XP.
Cutting down a forest is acutally rather easy. It's already stretching my suspension of disbelief that my tribe had a logging operation for 11000 years and in year 1000 AD can still have the same forest it had from the start of the game...
I'm not opposed to using IP personally, but presumably the devs had a reason.
Also I just played a God Kings games with like 85 Stone Cutters so I guess when you are making 300 Engineering a turn in Age 7 you are more willing to spend that Engineering since you are constantly capped out anyways.
But you'll notice I did suggest heavy reductions in Engineering cost.