Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Unless I'm missing something?
For the narrative, that I get, you write your own story and why not play them if it is fun!
But for the playstyle? They don't give you any advantage at all. They don't give you free units and thus vassals like the other military style, the raiders, they don't give you free food like the 3 explorations one, they don't give you culture, sanitation, knoweldge or anything.
In fact, what do they give you? I really don't see the point of taking them on a technical standpiont.
I agree that their main thing is defense, but in that age, the AI will not rush you anyway.
Maybe it's a thing for multiplayer (?)
National spirits bonusses do not go away (like governments do) when you change era (or, if they do, that one was bugged XD).
Gaining XP while idle does not sound weak, but I haven't played it. How do Spartans stack up (stat-wise) against Raiders?
Raiders keep their stats against Militia units, which make them viable against rebellions and therefore peacekeepers in less "Age of Blood crisis" uprising times. Which is kinda funny, that you have Raiders turn into a viable policing force for law and order.
Worked out pretty well for me in the latest game. One need to play them agressive and go on the offisive. But not in the same way as Raiders. Since you biggest strenght in the end is that you can go on the defense and just take a hit.
Naturally the spartans themselves will fall off in value with time, especially at one point you won't be able to make more of them. Of course by that point your facing enemies that are easly a match to them. But 4 (not including capstone) of the abilties continues to be in effect for the whole game. With raiders in comparisons the long term benefits ends pre-gunpowered units with the exception of one ability.
On a pangaea world I can see how raiders maybe better. But if you play on a map where you can not effectivly move all over the place until you get to the age of Renaissance, the longterm effects of Warrior is better I think.
That is not to say it is the best. But I think it offers more value longterm then the other combat focused one. And if you doing a lot of battling early on you will get war XP. So it will go fast upgrading the whole tree.
For a peaceful run... then yeah. There other national spirits that hold more longerm value. And often economy wins over pure millitary might. Athens often bested Sparta after all simply becouse they could leverage there economy.
As a final statement it brings me great joy watching 2 Spartans and a scout turned into a I leader flatten multiple stacks of raiders
I really like in this game how special units are actually very powerful and will last you multiple ages before they become obsolete, innovations can also make them stronger. For example this crusader game I am player where I went radiers, giving combat bonuses to my knights and then i innovated +5 def and atk on them, they do 4x damage to ranged, there is very few things that can stop my great crusade for the holy religion of Manifest Destiny.
A 4 stack of knights are pushing 300 combat value, absolutely nuts.
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/2520400398633965934/8B53C35FE2B717FF436F898C0B65DF2D34F7A1F3/