Paradox SERIOUSLY?!?!?!

[Lexticus]

Cashing in on someone else's greatness (IE Civilization)..Paywalls for Tech? Port forwarding? Seriously Paradox, you should be focusing your attention on fixing the games you are known for, instead of making a copy of Civilization. you have clearly hitting all the marks though.
1. Put out a game, then make it overly complicated, and no fun any more with Hearts of Iron 4 . Check!!!
2. Make a game then rework it constantly that you cannot finish it, but refusing to fix the bugs, and just make more and more DLC. (IE Stellaris) CHECK
4. Buying a game from a small studio, then destroying it, turning off the multiplayer function (IE Battletech) Check
3. Now cloning a game to try and get that almighty dollar ( IE Civilization) CHECK.

Seriously Paradox, your creative design team, and upper management are just second rate.

[Mouse]

These guys are a studio not paradox, paradox is the publisher but they don't care, we all have played paradox games at one point and they all have very similar things, im surprised they didn't do a "civ" before, they basicly are mixing humankind and civ, to see what glues in, if u like it and think it can be better sugest something so they can fix it, if not go play something else and rant at PARADOX web page not here its useless they don't care, they won't even see it.

[The Former]

Paywalls for tech...? Where are you reading that?

Anyway Paradox's creative design team had nothing to do with this game. This wasn't developed by Paradox Development Studio, but C Prompt. Paradox only did the advertising.

[Finarfin]

Paradox homegrown games are great; those they publish for others not so much.

[The Former]

Originally posted by Finarfin:

Paradox homegrown games are great; those they publish for others not so much.

Age of Wonders is pretty damn good IMO.

[Finarfin]

Originally posted by Ärlig, Paradoxriddaren:

Originally posted by Finarfin:

Paradox homegrown games are great; those they publish for others not so much.

Age of Wonders is pretty damn good IMO.

I actually forgot about that one. Good catch.

[Deadwinter]

for a copy of civ VI i agree, s hit multiplayer, need xxx dlc and so many mods to be ok...jk or not lol... for civ i am not, for this game not perfect it is new but later with patchs and mods like there say will be here this will be a nice game, its combine many games in one and try to improve it... will love a real earth map or so...

[alexosaurous]

reading these forums, I don't think ppl understand the difference between a developers and the publisher, guys google is a thing if you don't understand words google them, Paradox is not the developers for this game it has no paradox developers on this game its not taking away from any of there other games

they are just the publisher that is it

[Deadwinter]

oh the toxic/troll is back from is ban already lol Troxter gtf out, your opinion worth nothing.

[Exemplar]

i have enjoyed all civ franchise games. i have participated in bug reports, strat discussions and community help forums. take that for what you will, but as self-proclaimed "experienced", i do not find this game to be a civ clone. there are obvious similarities from a 3rd person observation point, i understand, but the mechanisms and math are wholly disparate.

as a matter of fact, i will say now civ could benefit from a couple of millennia's mechanisms, and i would not be surprised to see "supply chain" style economy in civ 7.

[darkbird1000]

I actually love paradox games :P
Just hard to keep up with the DLC

[Voryn Dagoth Ur]

Originally posted by Ärlig, Paradoxriddaren:

Paywalls for tech...? Where are you reading that?

Anyway Paradox's creative design team had nothing to do with this game. This wasn't developed by Paradox Development Studio, but C Prompt. Paradox only did the advertising.

The Atomic Age dlc.