Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
1. You're building the same prison, either via couch co-op or online co-op.
Solution: Stream it to your friends on Discord and give them a vote on your decisions, or have your friends sit with you and do the same.
2. Build different prisons.
Solution: Play the game separately and periodically share your work with your friends. You'd have to do this anyway.
You guys really want the devs to dedicate resources - LONG-TERM resources - to establishing netcode and maintaining servers? And many of you (not all) are complaining about the price of the game as it is. Servers are expensive, you know.
With the solutions I've posited above, is it really worth this game going from $40 to $50-60?
Regarding your concern about servers and the associated costs, there's something called peer-to-peer. Or if you prefer, dedicated servers, although they are less relevant here, as the game doesn't have particularly extensive scale.
By the way, the previous game also had multiplayer (though not at release), and it didn't incur any additional costs for us players. So, if the game comes with a $5 increase for multiplayer, it would be reasonable. Demanding more than that is excessive.
no
I agree with this..
in case of hardship i will pay 10€ extra xD