Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And then give the choice to buy extra options in the relic rooms, since extra relics make preferred ones less frequent. 50k to get a third, 150k to get a fourth, 500k to get a fifth.
Maybe the physical traits, visual traits, and statistical traits could be separate, and there's a 10% chance for a trait from any of the three trait trees. If it does choose that category, it then chooses one from that category.
Then there could even be a small(1%) chance of having a color blind dwarf, or a nostalgic giant. Lol. And, there would even be at .1% chance of having 3 traits! Imagine.
Use to do coding for things like this all the time years ago, this is like an afternoon task at best even with testing.
Would be cool to have this.
I think Giant and Dwarf should get exclusive treatment since they are such "important" traits, and either be in a pool of their own,
or have their percentages adjusted slightly over the "normal traits"