Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
EDIT: I realize this is an old post but someone may find it useful.
Time compression. Lets just say, that you may want to NOT speed up time too fast in smaller aircraft and you can use higher time acceleration in larger, less flimsy aircraft.
But what about my point above though? Isn't exactly easy, eh? ;)
Edit: but if you meant the 172 thread, I was just surprised that sometimes you can come up with reasonable things, is all. In fact, it looks like we share the same opinion not all that rarely. But I'm surprised with your behavior otherwise...
As for MFS being "fine"... A day or two ago some users lost access to their Premium stuff. I wasn't among them for whatever reason (and I'm happy about that), so I tried to figure out what was going on and possibly help them (which I failed at).
Turned out it was Microsoft, as they admitted it and fixed the issue. But in your own personal little world "MFS is fine". Well...