Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm not trying to sell you on MSFS 2020 or 2024 but I think your logic is falsely based on the assumption MSFS 2020 has the same flight modeling as FSX. As for X-Plane vs. the current MSFS, this snippet was recently posted in a similar debate in this forum:
As for DCS, if you think the limited maps are sufficient in size and detail for jet liners, I'll concede that. However, even the premium DCS maps are not of a significantly higher resolution than the base MSFS world. Maybe I should fly over some MSFS regions without streaming any Bing map textures and compare the scenery to their DCS equivalents.
Anyhow, I currently only fly MSFS single engine GA aircraft these days. MSFS 2020 surpasses Prepar3D, even with P3D loaded to the rafters with weather and scenery addons. But as I said before, I can't speak to commercial jets or how they compare across any flight simulation platform.