Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
Yeah. I did use a bit of a deadzone before but brought it back to 0.
I set my sensitivity for my stick (don't have a yoke) to -80, and have a dead zone of 5. That makes things far more controllable and eliminates any unwanted drift.
How much to set it really depends on your hardware though. The best you can do is experiment.
In any case, it's something in the game that's fundamentally flawed and needs to be addressed. All we're doing is trying to compensate for issues in the sim, and we'll likely never get it perfect until Asobo fix it. We need controls to be less sensitive while remaining linear. The sensitivity adjustment removes that linearity. It's a stopgap solution at best, but it can improve the experience a bit.
In the end, the A320 is still broken as ♥♥♥♥, and nothing we can do as end users will ever fix that. We have to depend on either Asobo or modders for that.
Originally posted by Pilotguy:
Deadzones at 0?
I set my sensitivity for my stick (don't have a yoke) to -80, and have a dead zone of 5. That makes things far more controllable and eliminates any unwanted drift.
How much to set it really depends on your hardware though. The best you can do is experiment.
In any case, it's something in the game that's fundamentally flawed and needs to be addressed. All we're doing is trying to compensate for issues in the sim, and we'll likely never get it perfect until Asobo fix it. We need controls to be less sensitive while remaining linear. The sensitivity adjustment removes that linearity. It's a stopgap solution at best, but it can improve the experience a bit.
In the end, the A320 is still broken as ♥♥♥♥, and nothing we can do as end users will ever fix that. We have to depend on either Asobo or modders for that.
Had to copy ^^^^^^ would not let me quote you.
I thought it was just me but the A30 (for me) is either full throttle or off.
My personal experience with the A320 comes from less than a dozen flights, and it's never worked right. Any problem I've encountered in other planes is magnified 100x over with the A320.
In contrast, my son flies it all the time and only has encountered minor issues with it. We've compared it, and he can definitely confirm that for me it's basically unflyable compared to on his system.
NOWHERE near "resulting in awful landings". Not even close.
Is it rivet perfect to some kind of specs? Dunno, don't care for the most part, they function fine and third parties will work to appease the rivet counters.
As far as the A320 itself, the argument "some users have small annoying bugs, to large ones that make it "impossible to fly" is just a nonsense argument from a logic stand point. It can't be both - It either has some small bugs or it's a disaster. I flew it twice today on two full short ILS flights and it performed just fine including assignment of last minute approaches from ATC (which was stupid in other ways).
It has small annoyances that are being gradually patched out to the level of a default level aircraft. A third party is basing a very popular mod on it, and many are enjoying it.
Not "fanboying", if you don't like the sim, I don't care, but there is no general "OMG sensitivity" issue that makes all the aircraft difficult to land.
I hit the button to lower engine speed, it goes from full to zero, (been flying since Kittyhawk). So your lack of responsibility is unneeded.
Whether or not you choose to believe something or not doesn't make it any less true.
My son who flies the A320 regularly on his PC tried on my PC and the plane is unflyable. It does all kinds of crazy stuff, lurches to the sides without input, dives, or a plethora of other stuff that it wasn't told to do. You're lucky to get it off the ground at all, and even luckier to keep it in the air.
I can fly it just fine on his PC though. It seems to do what it's told for the most part, and aside from some AP bugs, it seems to work as intended. Others have reported the same issues with the A320. It seems to be a minority, but it doesn't mean because you're not experiencing an issue that others aren't
Personally, I don't give a rat's ass about the A320 and I can't be arsed to try to diagnose it because I have zero desire to fly airliners. But the problem is indeed there. The GA aircraft work pretty well for the most part and that's what I like to fly. The airliner issue has no impact on my enjoyment of the sim.
EDIT:
My son also brought his HOTAS (a T-Flight which I gave to him when I got my new X56 a couple of weeks ago) and we connected it to my computer for him to try. Checked sensitivity settings and such to ensure it matched his settings. My HOTAS or his, the A320 was unflyable.
The sensivity of flight simulators depends very much on your framerate. Higher framerate gives more controll = less sensivity.
I have a Ryzen 2700x, 32GB and RTX2080
My son has a Ryzen 3800X, 32GB and GTX 1070
In terms of fps, I get a bit higher than he does, although not a whole lot. In any case, we can both maintain 30+ fps in all but the busiest areas. There's nothing here hardware-wise that would make for such a discrepancy in flying experience between his PC and mine when all other planes work just fine. Especially since I have the faster machine in terms of fps.