NIS is WAY better than FSR now

[whatthealex7]

Its just an info for any old NVIDIA GPU users. In terms of performance and image quality - NIS does way better at this moment. There is no blurried cars in 5m before you and overall image looks better. On a 1660ti Laptop im able to scale the game up to 2k and still have around 30fps. Setting 2k res and FSR to ultra performance makes picture a blurry mess and game stutters heavily and rarely got over 20fps.

[Slackerdude74]

Unless I am mistaken the FSR in this game is either FSR2.x or FSR3.0 and both of this suck. If this game had FSR3.1 and frame gen or would be much better.

[whatthealex7]

Originally posted by ghstbstr:

Unless I am mistaken the FSR in this game is either FSR2.x or FSR3.0 and both of this suck. If this game had FSR3.1 and frame gen or would be much better.

There is no choice atm. If you dont have frame gen its either NIS or FSR

[Quick☢420™]

Originally posted by whatthealex7:

Its just an info for any old NVIDIA GPU users. In terms of performance and image quality - NIS does way better at this moment. There is no blurried cars in 5m before you and overall image looks better. On a 1660ti Laptop im able to scale the game up to 2k and still have around 30fps. Setting 2k res and FSR to ultra performance makes picture a blurry mess and game stutters heavily and rarely got over 20fps.

Lossless Scaling beats them both by a mile. It's available on steam....

[SirHawk]

Originally posted by Quick☢420™:

Lossless Scaling beats them both by a mile. It's available on steam....

The only thing Lossless Scaling beats is beating image quality to a pulp, while also introducing TONS of additional input latency... Like solid 50% increase, compared to a native input lag, it's horrendously bad idea to run Lossless Scaling in a racing game, even AMD's framegen is subpar since their Anti-Lag is still handicapped.