Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
I will be looking into that scenario tomorrow and make some needed changes
Thanks a ton for your feedback, I am not super knowledgable about this battle so your input is truly valuable (as would be any other player's)
So, stay tuned for more...
PS: No, there is no way to have AT paras. I mean, not as a separate unit. All AT infantry would be paras. This can all be modded of course, by duplicated the base AT infantry and simply toggling the 'isParatrooper' toggle.
The AT issue can easily be fixed I think as there were significant glider landings of conventional Infantry at the LZs west of Arnhem initially secured by the first Para landings. These Infantry units had light Arty and light 6-pounder AT guns. The Infantry secured and held the LZs and secured further LZs for further glider and Para landings - as well as Supplies- which means the occupied airfields and LZs could offer some limited supply?
There were at least 2 days of landings: day 1 saw Brit Paras and Gliders with Scottish Borderer Infantry and day 2 more Paras, the Polish Paras (who landed at Driel south of the river and had some success crossing in small boats to reinforce the Brits under pressure on the north side in Oosterbeek) and more gliders and limited supplies. Limited as the Germans shot down some supply planes and over ran some LZs designated for supply drops.
Despite losses the Paras did initially secure the north (town) side of the bridge and held out for 4 days but despite several near suicidal assaults across the bridge failed to secure the south side, but it was close. Its quite amazing that the plan only required them to hold Arnhem bridge for 2 days. Monty's eternal optimism planned for XXX Core to then relieve them! Nijmegen put a stop to that timeline.
When it was clear that they could not secure the bridge and the troops in the town were pinned down and surrounded, the Paras and infantry who hadn't made it to the town or were able to withdraw set up a perimeter at Oosterbeek. The idea was if they could hold this area on the north bank of the Rhine then maybe XXX Core could bridge the Rhine here and progress. In the end they could not hold out for XXX Core's arrival here either, despite hanging on for 9 days.
For the US airborne forces I am unclear. I think for some bridges they actually took them by surprise with light losses against poor quality reserves initially and then had to fight like hell to hold them. Others they had to fight to take before they were blown up* and had varied success. One of the delays of XXX Core was that they had to use Engineers to pontoon 'some' of the blown Bridges on the way. Not sure which ones, but I can look it up if it helps, I have more time in my hands than you do. Most of the US target bridges were secured I believe, especially as many had several, (Grave for example had 4 and only 1 or two were blown). Nijmegen was the main delay of course.
Finally ...
I think German heavy armour eventually arrived in Arnhem as reinforcements from the north, but initially they didn't have any to take on the paras, but they did have some armoured vehicles. I think there was the 10th SS Panzer Recon Division west of Arnhem and the 9th Panzer Division mobilised and attacked Arnhem from the north after a day or so. Not sure what kit they had.
Can you check the OoB for XXX Core and air support, it seems a bit weak to me, or it could be I just badly managed it, which is entirely possible as I just rushed through a few turns after I lost Arnhem at the start to see how the game flowed.
P.s..
This info is awesome in regards to the specific fight for Arnhem itself as part of the market garden campaign.. https://www.tracesofwar.com/themes/3644/Battle-of-Arnhem.htm#:~:text=The%20most%20important%20order%20for,Corps%20arrived%20from%20the%20south.&text=On%2017%20September%20the%20first,Zone)%20Z%20and%20LZ%20S.
I have just pushed an update concerning all Op. Market Garden
The scenario should be greatly overhauled
Let me know how it plays!
There might be balance changes made for one side or the other, though
(Axis vs Allies)
But generally speaking, if both countries are both in the Allies or Axis, scenario should be identical!
In this my first play through of the new version I did secure the US target bridges, suitably tough in a couple of cases, except for Son which is exactly what should occur historically. I'm going to replay soon as I want to think out whether I can change history and take Son
:)
Plus also I screwed up big time in Driel and now the Germans are bringing in reinforcements. (Does Driel have supply if taken?)
Also I didn't take Arnhem bridge, but I think I could if I concentrate my forces better, So again I'm going for a retry.
The XXX core advance seems to be proceeding as it should, but I still have a ways to go to reach Nijmegen (turn 5 / 16th September) so that feels cool and Nijmegen feels suitably ominous sitting up there in the FoW..
edit: you even blew up one of the Grave bridges! awesome attention to detail sir!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Market_Garden
I gave names to the bridges I could identify
As for Polish, well, technically, yes I could
I just personally don’t like to add an entire player to just play 2 units without doing anything else
Those 2 paras are indeed the polish ones, but I did not want to go the extra step of adding a polish player…
What I can do though is rename those units to “Polish paratroopers”
edit1-Daimler Armoured Cars can cross major rivers? OK if so, just asking.
edit2- Fascinating thing: if my Paras' in Arnhem could have hung on till around 22nd September, with your slow bleed in of Manpower I could have dropped 2 more Para units into Arnhem shortly after. Interesting...
I'd pay for a game with just this map and indeed I have before. I guess it can be tweaked for replayability by changing difficulty and beating my own score.
It would be cool if the scenario had a win or loose conclusion somehow, as I'm not sure how it ends if XXX Core simply runs out of steam and the player gives up.
i found it as I was wondering why XXX Core and the US Airborne en route to Nijmigen was getting tortured by the Luftwaffe, whom in my ignorance I thought was defunct by September 1944, quite the contrary it seems! As the article states:
- the Luftwaffe employed over 300 fighters to defend the breakthrough attempt. On Monday 18th September in Germany and northern Holland, the weather cleared just in time for the Luftwaffe's full effort to begin. Market Garden was the only battle in the campaign for Northwest Europe to be fought with Allied air inferiority, much of it self-inflicted.
- The airborne troops in Holland failed to get any close support, compared to the support given by the Luftwaffe who flew 125 sorties.
- Thursday (21st September) The Poles finally took off from England (bad weather in the UK) but forty-one out of 114 Dakotas had to turn back or land (almost the entire 1st Battalion) due to the weather and over a hundred Luftwaffe fighters were in the air to greet them as they approached the landing zone. A number broke through the fighter screen and claimed several more Dakotas, however Major General S Sosabowski landed with over 750 men, but with no heavy equipment (which had been lost in the gliders two days previous).
http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_arnhem.html