Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Тази тема е заключена 
Правила и насоки за дискусии
0 
Докладване на публикацията
The article that proves you wrong is irrelavant and also made by chaptgpt but the twitter link of marty talking about the vice article is irrelevant
I did when it first came out and that tiny peen energy of a man deleted all comments disagreeing with him, the storm rifle is actually fairly solid, it's basically a combination of the plasma rifle and plasma repeater
the supressor and scattershot are the actually bad weapons one's bullet velocity is slower than a spartans walking speed and the others spread is far to wide for 6 pellets but that's literally 2 out 24 weapons
he also throws the pulse grenade and literally says its bad because it doesn't act exactly like the plasma grenade, like no duh you wouldn't do that with the frag grenade either he without bothering to experiment thought it would be exactly like an incendiary, you should know, the no skill sticky that only appeared in halo 3 and no where else
pulse is more of an area denial grenade, it's perfect for protecting flags blocking of doors for a few seconds and ambushing, it's a support grenade in the same way the overcharge pp is
You call this praising smgs?
So you stupidly remove context again to make a point that can't work without the context you removed
Well glad to see you imply im right but are too stubborn to admit it, because why else would you move the goalpost to saturn
maybe i'll pull an actman and spend $20k on bots to inflate my opinion
can't come soon enough.
still i don't they suck quite as much as say ubisoft. they've become masters at ruining franchises and churning out garbage games, just a shame the games, such as they are still sell well....sends the wrong message.
halo anniversary and halo 4, 5, inf have flaws but at least they are playable. many new ubisoft games are so bad it ruins what fun there is.
ubisoft is top of my s list.
they learnt nothing from the halo 5 backlash.
it's like they just looked at games like r6 siege and thought, yeah, we'll do that.
damn didn't know 343 were behind the live service idea for sea of thieves and gears 5
oh wait thats microsoft
Do you have any proof or sources that The Act Man deleted these 'hate' comments? Because all of his Halo videos have 95% Likes which means the majority of Halo fans agree with his opinion. And no, the Halo 4 storm rifle was garbage compared to the plasma rifle in Halo 2.
Grenades are made to flush the enemy from cover. If the Prometheans who are basically ancient human civilization robots are unable to make a better grenade than M9 Grenade, then its obvious 343i ran out of ideas. Not to mention most of the Promethean weapons are copy pasta of Bungie's weapons.
He's not complaining about SMGs being weak or useless. He's just saying its not fun to spray and pray. If anything, he prefers BR's just like how I prefer DMR's.
It's not stupid when your context was completely irrelevant to the discussion or in this case not a fair comparison. It's like comparing Fortnite with Baldur's Gate 3 to see which is the better shooter game. In this scenario you're comparing Halo Wars which came out in 2009 to the first Command and Conquer game in 1995.
You're wrong on every accord. And you have no proof that The Act Man hires bots to back his opinions. Again, you're making another strawman argument because you lost the debate.
No you're just going to say "that isn't them defending 343 thats ai voices" like how you seriously think that about the vice article despite me linking marty's own twitter stating he was interviewed by them as chatgpt
The complete lack of anyone correcting him in the comments is plenty evidence
wow what a strawman argument, thinking every single like is by someone that played the franchise , almost as if you have nothing to validate you're wrong points or something
He says theres no skill in spam fests simply because you can't headshot with them, but lets be real the pistol was still a spam fest you could try and manipulate the game by keeping red reticle off the body so it'll only magnetize to the head but thats programmed not to be guaranteed and a certain unintentionally left in mechanic is the only thing preventing halo 2 brs from being spam fests too
Hey thanks for inadvertently proving my point about auto's being horrible in 3 and reach, no no, no backpeddling now people can see the original posts so don't even try and hide it in edits again
What a spoiled tantrum of a reaction; no something proving your wrong isn't magically irrelevant nor is it not a fair comparison especially when you tried to say halo wars was the most successful rts of all time with a wiki quote you had no caveats to that and you instantly back peddled on that to be recent to 2009 (SCII was more popular btw) and had to be relevant to halo, which theres only 2 rts games and the sequel barely sold more units despite improving on everything the first game introduced gameplay and level design wise, no Arcadia ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. So from you're original standpoint you're wrong on it being the best selling of all time, you're wrong on it being the most popular in its recent time and you're wrong on it being the rts halo compared to the one made under 343, going "lalalala" doesn't magically make you right.
You're entire debate methods of have been "nuh uh cause im an og" "nuh uh thats a strawman" "nuh uh some D list internet celebrity shares my opinion" and "nuh uh thats ai cause it proves me wrong" You've lost every single argument by just outright getting basic information on any of the games wrong, im sure after googling for confirmation bias you learned just a smidge more about the franchise but it still pales in comparison to actually playing the games. To be fair to act man it's not him using bots bot probably empresscortana using her sisters stolen credit card topped with Youtube actively pushing ragebait, any positive video with 3.5m views? nah that won't get the front page but this 2k views on the latest rage bait trend sure will! and they've been doing that since the 2012 algorithm change
And you're going to keep losing the debate by trying to use someone else opinions and trying to use the one ex bungie employee that burned bridges with his former friends for internet points
https://steamcharts.com/app/1240440
Yet you're making another strawman statement that makes no sense at all. Even his Like/Dislike ratio proves people agree with his Halo videos.
Yes the majority of his viewers are OG Bungie Halo players just like me. And there's so many ways to validate this and one of them being the downfall of Halo Infinite's playerbase.
I've not edit my post and your replies can prevent me from doing that. I've only mentioned Halo 4 having the worst automatic weapons which include the suppressor and storm rifle. Bungie's automatic weapons are valid because the enemies you encounter in Halo 3 and Reach are viable against any weapon you choose to counter them with.
You're trying really hard to counter argument by twisting words between Campaign and Multiplayer. But this conversation started with the Campaign. As for Multiplayer, its been BRs since Halo 2.
The source is from the wiki. And it took me a simple research to prove your point wrong when you stated Ensemble Studios was shut down due to Halo Wars. Star Craft 2 wasn't released on consoles.
I know reading is hard for you but let me quote the wiki -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_Wars
"The game sold one million units worldwide through March 2009, making it the best-selling console real-time strategy game to date."
Because that's how arguments work when debating against someone like you who disregards other people's opinions and using strawman arguments without any context, evidence or proof.
I have to link wiki, reddit posts and the opinion of Youtubers to further prove you wrong aside from my own opinions otherwise your fallacy might sound like the truth to some. To know the truth, a person needs to do their research which you clearly have not done once. Instead you took, no, wasted your time by providing a link from an AI generate Vice post.
After all I've said and proven you wrong on multiple occasions, you're claiming that The Act Man uses bots for his Like/Dislike ratio and comments which is downright childish. Now your nerves are hitting you again and you're spouting out nonsense about empresscortana using her sister stolen credit card, like who cares?
Just like 343i, you completely stay away from the discussion of Halo because aside from losing the debate, you have no passion for the franchise.
Thank you for admitting I "won" this argument by just outright admitting everything you don't agree with is a strawman, not evidence, and somehow not proof, all future comments of yours just further prove this
You wanna prove me wrong get me a podcast of Joe staten, Paul Russel, Marcus Lehto, Max Hoberman, and Paul Bertone agreeing with anything you say, iT sHouLnD'T bE tHaT hArD"
It's such a shame that Destiny has gone on for so long that people take it for granted and don't see it as anything special. They went from making the Halo Games (the ONLY reason XBOX exists today, and it's easy to see why- the people in charge are NOT very good at their jobs)
I know the angry mobs are angry at Destiny right now- but if that game released today with zero knowledge it would be the biggest selling game of our era. People just have quite a short attention span. Perhaps why memes and those videos that show 100 people getting hit in the balls over a 1 minute span are so popular.
People that hate destiny are in a few groups:
1) Didn't play it but just LOVE to join angry mobs. From what I've seen the largest group. "I got 1900 Hours Of This Game But Now I'm Mad, THumbs Down."
2) Didn't play it. It's super-smooth FPS combat with lots of content and an insane amount of weapons/gear. Think Halo but open-world.
3) Played game and actually disliked it. The smallest group, but if you take away the Halo-Level-Smoothness of Combat/Transversal, the fact you have dozens of weapons with TONS of varients instead of the typical 6-10 weapons, or just are not fans of shooters. That's fine, but I just have trouble comparing a typical cross-section of gameplay of Destiny 1 or 2 to any given FPS and thinking that Destiny is worse.
It's just a mob thing. Anything that is popular for any amount of time will get an angry rebound. One part of human psychology that I always found extremely stupid and counter-productive. I think it might have to do with the whole "If you make money you are evil" thing. They certainly did great for a very long time and people under a certain age or that didn't grow up in the former USSR seem to think that socialism is good. It just makes everyone starve to death and have to wait in lines for basic goods, but I guess some people like that sort of thing.