is this game worth in 2024

[Stasiu800]

i don t know if it is worth my money are graphics still ♥♥♥♥♥♥ like in 2016?

[niaerniopawrjnko]

Publicado originalmente por ༄ˡᵛ᭄✿ᴋᴀᴡᴀɪɪ:

Publicado originalmente por niaerniopawrjnko:

You never even played battlefield heroes so I dont know why you are commenting on it.
Maybe because its' a game that died just as fast it launched?
The truth is all newer battlefield games are made for a new generation of gamers, people who suck at video games and want to put 0 effort into actually improving and allowing players to get kills through 0 interaction with the enemy, so it fits perfectly for people like you

The truth here, is that people like you can and will think and project whatever you feel like on a forum, if it makes you feel any better about yourself.

I'm here only to ridicule the points your types of basement dwellers make for some cheap comedic relief.

So are you actually going to refute any my points? Perhaps if you spent less time watching anime you would know what "project" means???

Also looking at your gameplay you are exactly the type of player Im talking about. Running around with a no skill LMG and missing almost all your shots...

[A_cat_named_Hercules]

Publicado originalmente por niaerniopawrjnko:

Complete garbage, inferior to bad company 2, bf3, bf4 and even battlefield heroes in litetally every single way besides graphics

Ummmmm...no.I've only played 3 and 4,and in anyway they are better than this one in any aspect.Especially immesrsion wise,not only graphics.The gunplay is better too,if you learn how to aim considering the distance and bullet trajectory.

[BigC]

It may be only BF that it's still worth playing. Multiplayer masterpiece in my opinion, loving every bit of the game. Too bad I had trash pc back then when it was released.

[niaerniopawrjnko]

Publicado originalmente por A_cat_named_Hercules:

Publicado originalmente por niaerniopawrjnko:

Complete garbage, inferior to bad company 2, bf3, bf4 and even battlefield heroes in litetally every single way besides graphics

Ummmmm...no.I've only played 3 and 4,and in anyway they are better than this one in any aspect.Especially immesrsion wise,not only graphics.The gunplay is better too,if you learn how to aim considering the distance and bullet trajectory.

Gunplay is not better, ive pretty much played all relevant fps pvp games and this is one of the worst in terms of gunplay. There is a reason the only people who play this game are people who care about graphics, anyone who cares about gameplay would play literally ANY other fps game but this garbage.

[Babb56]

Publicado originalmente por Stasiu800:

i don t know if it is worth my money are graphics still ♥♥♥♥♥♥ like in 2016?

wait until it is on sale for less than 3 dollars

[A_cat_named_Hercules]

Publicado originalmente por niaerniopawrjnko:

Publicado originalmente por A_cat_named_Hercules:

Ummmmm...no.I've only played 3 and 4,and in anyway they are better than this one in any aspect.Especially immesrsion wise,not only graphics.The gunplay is better too,if you learn how to aim considering the distance and bullet trajectory.

Gunplay is not better, ive pretty much played all relevant fps pvp games and this is one of the worst in terms of gunplay. There is a reason the only people who play this game are people who care about graphics, anyone who cares about gameplay would play literally ANY other fps game but this garbage.

As i said.Gunplay is better IF you learn how to aim.As for your other points,i'd still play Wolfenstein Enemy Territory over any BF (except 1942 and 1943) any day,although the graphics are way inferior.By your whole argument ET it is a better game than the BF series,but the truth here is that they are way different games.

[niaerniopawrjnko]

Publicado originalmente por A_cat_named_Hercules:

Publicado originalmente por niaerniopawrjnko:

Gunplay is not better, ive pretty much played all relevant fps pvp games and this is one of the worst in terms of gunplay. There is a reason the only people who play this game are people who care about graphics, anyone who cares about gameplay would play literally ANY other fps game but this garbage.

As i said.Gunplay is better IF you learn how to aim.As for your other points,i'd still play Wolfenstein Enemy Territory over any BF (except 1942 and 1943) any day,although the graphics are way inferior.By your whole argument ET it is a better game than the BF series,but the truth here is that they are way different games.

The random spread and sweet spot mechanic only exists to allow bad players to compete with skilled players. Yes, I am calling you bad because no good player thinks having the lowest skill gap of any battlefield game is a good thing...

[A_cat_named_Hercules]

Publicado originalmente por niaerniopawrjnko:

Publicado originalmente por A_cat_named_Hercules:

As i said.Gunplay is better IF you learn how to aim.As for your other points,i'd still play Wolfenstein Enemy Territory over any BF (except 1942 and 1943) any day,although the graphics are way inferior.By your whole argument ET it is a better game than the BF series,but the truth here is that they are way different games.

The random spread and sweet spot mechanic only exists to allow bad players to compete with skilled players. Yes, I am calling you bad because no good player thinks having the lowest skill gap of any battlefield game is a good thing...

By no means learning the sweetspot mechanic and one-shot killing people camping with a sniper rifle is a sign of "skill",or at least it's not the only sign to tell a skilled player.To be fair,i consider these people idiots,so here is a point we agree upon.
Try defending an entry point against an enemy assault alone and survive long enough for your team to arrive,if you have actual skill.Then we'll have this conversation again.