Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Some of the negative reviews are talking about EA's kernel-level anticheat that was implemented despite BF5 being end of development, which also makes it unplayable for Steam Deck users.
BF2 is ww2,The picture quality is more colorful, as shown in the work "Battle of Midway",Both games have cheats, and there is no one with fewer and more。
I personally think BF1 is better,becase BF5 is more of a semi-finished product.
Just a personal opinion, no verbal malice.
BFV is too bad. most are toxic, try too hard. I played it by buying a month from EA club. and I hated every experience playing that. Immersion in BFV is non-existent.
BFV sucks, buy and play bf1.